ABSTRACT
Background@#The purpose of this study was to compare clavicular tunnel complications after coracoclavicular (CC) reconstruction between a coracoid loop fixation group and a coracoid tunnel fixation group. We hypothesized that clavicular tunnel complications would be more common in the coracoid loop group. @*Methods@#This retrospective study evaluated 24 patients who underwent CC reconstruction using coracoid tunnel fixation (n = 14) and coracoid loop fixation (n = 10). Radiographic measurements included the CC distance and clavicular tunnel diameter. Clavicular tunnel complications such as tunnel widening and clavicular tunnel fractures were investigated. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder score and the University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder score. @*Results@#The mean follow-up period was 17.5 months (range, 11–38 months). The final clavicular tunnel diameter and the increase in the clavicular tunnel diameter in millimeter and percentage were significantly greater in the coracoid loop group than in the coracoid tunnel group (all p < 0.05). Clavicular tunnel widening more than 100% was found in 5 patients, all belonging to the coracoid loop group. Clavicular tunnel fractures occurred in 3 patients (all in the coracoid loop group). Fracture was associated with severe tunnel widening (more than 100% increase). The mean value of the final clavicular tunnel diameter in patients with fractures was significantly larger than that in patients without (12.7 ± 3.3 mm vs. 8.4 ± 1.5 mm, p = 0.016). @*Conclusions@#Clavicular tunnel complications such as significant tunnel widening and fractures after CC reconstructions in acromioclavicular dislocations were common with the coracoid loop fixation technique. A greater clavicular tunnel widening and resultantly enlarged tunnel diameter might increase the risk of fracture through the clavicular tunnel.
ABSTRACT
Background@#Lateral collateral ligament injuries may occur in patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis. The present study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic debridement between patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis combined with a partial ligament injury and those without a ligament injury. @*Methods@#Between 2016 and 2018, patients who underwent arthroscopic debridement for lateral epicondylitis were evaluated. Partial injury to the lateral collateral ligament was defined as discontinuity or thinning with increased signal of the lateral ligament on magnetic resonance imaging and laxity with a firm endpoint in the varus or posterolateral rotatory stress test. Arthroscopic debridement was performed when there was no apparent instability in the stress test under fluoroscopic guidance after anesthesia. Patients with a ligament injury were compared with those without a ligament injury in terms of physical examination (varus stress test and posterolateral rotatory drawer test), pain visual analog scale, Mayo elbow performance score, and quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score. @*Results@#There were 38 patients in the intact ligament group and 15 patients in the partial ligament injury group. There were 23 men and 30 women, and the mean patient age was 50 years (range, 27–77 years). The mean follow-up period was 30 months (range, 24–49 months). Instability was not observed in both groups at the last follow-up, and clinical scores improved significantly after surgery. Postoperative results did not show significant difference between the two groups. One patient in the partial injury group underwent revision open debridement owing to persistent pain. @*Conclusions@#The clinical outcomes of arthroscopic debridement for lateral epicondylitis did not show significant differences between patients with a partial ligament injury and those without a ligament injury.
ABSTRACT
We performed a revisionary open reduction and internal fixation for treating nonunion of the mid-shaft of the left clavicle with an autogenous cancellous bone graft. On postoperative day 4, the patient presented with neurologic deficits in the left upper extremity. We removed the implant and made a superior angulation to decompress the brachial plexus. At 6 months postoperatively, callus bridging and consolidation were visible and all hand and elbow functions were fully recovered. Our case suggests that brachial plexus neuropathy may be caused by stretching and compression after reduction and straightening of the nonunion site around adhesions or scar tissue. Therefore, care should be taken whether there are the risk factors that can cause brachial plexus neuropathy when revision surgery is performed for treating nonunion of a clavicle shaft fracture.
Subject(s)
Humans , Bony Callus , Brachial Plexus Neuropathies , Brachial Plexus , Cicatrix , Clavicle , Elbow , Hand , Neurologic Manifestations , Risk Factors , Transplants , Upper ExtremityABSTRACT
Most distal radius fractures are currently being treated with anterior plating using anatomical precontoured locking compression plates via the anterior approach. However, it is difficult to fix the volar articular marginal fragment because these anatomical plates should be placed proximally to the watershed line. There were just a few methods of fixation for this fragment on medical literature. Herein, we introduced a tension band wiring technique for fixation of a volar articular marginal fragment in the distal radius.