ABSTRACT
【Objective】 To compare the clinical efficacy and sagittal parameters of oblique lateral interbody fusion （OLIF） combined with posterior percutaneous internal fixation and percutaneous transforaminal endoscope-assisted posterior lumbar interbody fusion （PT-Endo-TLIF） in treating degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. 【Methods】 A retrospective analysis was made on 43 patients with Meyerding Ⅰ and Ⅱ° degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis treated in our hospital from September 2017 to January 2020. Among them 23 cases were treated by OLIF， and the other 20 cases were treated by PT-Endo-TLIF. We observed and recorded the operation time， average length of hospital stay， and intraoperative blood loss， and postoperative complications of the patients. The patients were followed up 3 day， 6 and 12 months after the operation. The lumbar sagittal parameters of the two groups were compared by X-ray， CT and MRI examinations. The patients’ lower back pain was recorded for visual analogue scale （VAS）， and Oswestry disability index （ODI） was used to evaluate the clinical efficacy. 【Results】 Both groups of patients successfully completed the operation and follow-up， with the average follow-up time of 12 months. The average amount of intraoperative blood loss and operation time were significantly lower in OLIF group than in PT-Endo-TLIF group （P<0.05）. Intervertebral height increased significantly in the two groups after operation compared with pre-operation （P<0.05）. Compared with pre-operation， lumbar lordosis angle， lower lumbar lordosis angle and lumbar lordosis distribution index increased in both groups （P<0.05）， with no significant difference between them （P>0.05）. The inclination angle of L4 vertebral body and the distance between L1 vertical line and S1 in both groups were decreased compared with those before surgery （P<0.05）， but there was no significant difference between the two groups （P>0.05）. The inclination angle of L5 vertebral body in the two groups was increased compared with that before surgery （P<0.05）， but there was no statistical significance between both groups （P>0.05）. 【Conclusion】 OLIF surgical technique has the comparative advantages of definite curative effect， less trauma， fewer surgical complications， shorter operation time， less bleeding， and good recovery of the height of intervertebral space， which is suitable for its application among clinicians.