Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Thanh-N. NGUYEN; Muhammad-M. QURESHI; Piers KLEIN; Hiroshi YAMAGAMI; Mohamad ABDALKADER; Robert MIKULIK; Anvitha SATHYA; Ossama-Yassin MANSOUR; Anna CZLONKOWSKA; Hannah LO; Thalia-S. FIELD; Andreas CHARIDIMOU; Soma BANERJEE; Shadi YAGHI; James-E. SIEGLER; Petra SEDOVA; Joseph KWAN; Diana-Aguiar DE-SOUSA; Jelle DEMEESTERE; Violiza INOA; Setareh-Salehi OMRAN; Liqun ZHANG; Patrik MICHEL; Davide STRAMBO; João-Pedro MARTO; Raul-G. NOGUEIRA; Espen-Saxhaug KRISTOFFERSEN; Georgios TSIVGOULIS; Virginia-Pujol LEREIS; Alice MA; Christian ENZINGER; Thomas GATTRINGER; Aminur RAHMAN; Thomas BONNET; Noémie LIGOT; Sylvie DE-RAEDT; Robin LEMMENS; Peter VANACKER; Fenne VANDERVORST; Adriana-Bastos CONFORTO; Raquel-C.T. HIDALGO; Daissy-Liliana MORA-CUERVO; Luciana DE-OLIVEIRA-NEVES; Isabelle LAMEIRINHAS-DA-SILVA; Rodrigo-Targa MARTÍNS; Letícia-C. REBELLO; Igor-Bessa SANTIAGO; Teodora SADELAROVA; Rosen KALPACHKI; Filip ALEXIEV; Elena-Adela CORA; Michael-E. KELLY; Lissa PEELING; Aleksandra PIKULA; Hui-Sheng CHEN; Yimin CHEN; Shuiquan YANG; Marina ROJE-BEDEKOVIC; Martin ČABAL; Dusan TENORA; Petr FIBRICH; Pavel DUŠEK; Helena HLAVÁČOVÁ; Emanuela HRABANOVSKA; Lubomír JURÁK; Jana KADLČÍKOVÁ; Igor KARPOWICZ; Lukáš KLEČKA; Martin KOVÁŘ; Jiří NEUMANN; Hana PALOUŠKOVÁ; Martin REISER; Vladimir ROHAN; Libor ŠIMŮNEK; Ondreij SKODA; Miroslav ŠKORŇA; Martin ŠRÁMEK; Nicolas DRENCK; Khalid SOBH; Emilie LESAINE; Candice SABBEN; Peggy REINER; Francois ROUANET; Daniel STRBIAN; Stefan BOSKAMP; Joshua MBROH; Simon NAGEL; Michael ROSENKRANZ; Sven POLI; Götz THOMALLA; Theodoros KARAPANAYIOTIDES; Ioanna KOUTROULOU; Odysseas KARGIOTIS; Lina PALAIODIMOU; José-Dominguo BARRIENTOS-GUERRA; Vikram HUDED; Shashank NAGENDRA; Chintan PRAJAPATI; P.N. SYLAJA; Achmad-Firdaus SANI; Abdoreza GHOREISHI; Mehdi FARHOUDI; Elyar SADEGHI-HOKMABADI; Mazyar HASHEMILAR; Sergiu-Ionut SABETAY; Fadi RAHAL; Maurizio ACAMPA; Alessandro ADAMI; Marco LONGONI; Raffaele ORNELLO; Leonardo RENIERI; Michele ROMOLI; Simona SACCO; Andrea SALMAGGI; Davide SANGALLI; Andrea ZINI; Kenichiro SAKAI; Hiroki FUKUDA; Kyohei FUJITA; Hirotoshi IMAMURA; Miyake KOSUKE; Manabu SAKAGUCHI; Kazutaka SONODA; Yuji MATSUMARU; Nobuyuki OHARA; Seigo SHINDO; Yohei TAKENOBU; Takeshi YOSHIMOTO; Kazunori TOYODA; Takeshi UWATOKO; Nobuyuki SAKAI; Nobuaki YAMAMOTO; Ryoo YAMAMOTO; Yukako YAZAWA; Yuri SUGIURA; Jang-Hyun BAEK; Si-Baek LEE; Kwon-Duk SEO; Sung-Il SOHN; Jin-Soo LEE; Anita-Ante ARSOVSKA; Chan-Yong CHIEH; Wan-Asyraf WAN-ZAIDI; Wan-Nur-Nafisah WAN-YAHYA; Fernando GONGORA-RIVERA; Manuel MARTINEZ-MARINO; Adrian INFANTE-VALENZUELA; Diederik DIPPEL; Dianne-H.K. VAN-DAM-NOLEN; Teddy-Y. WU; Martin PUNTER; Tajudeen-Temitayo ADEBAYO; Abiodun-H. BELLO; Taofiki-Ajao SUNMONU; Kolawole-Wasiu WAHAB; Antje SUNDSETH; Amal-M. AL-HASHMI; Saima AHMAD; Umair RASHID; Liliana RODRIGUEZ-KADOTA; Miguel-Ángel VENCES; Patrick-Matic YALUNG; Jon-Stewart-Hao DY; Waldemar BROLA; Aleksander DĘBIEC; Malgorzata DOROBEK; Michal-Adam KARLINSKI; Beata-M. LABUZ-ROSZAK; Anetta LASEK-BAL; Halina SIENKIEWICZ-JAROSZ; Jacek STASZEWSKI; Piotr SOBOLEWSKI; Marcin WIĄCEK; Justyna ZIELINSKA-TUREK; André-Pinho ARAÚJO; Mariana ROCHA; Pedro CASTRO; Patricia FERREIRA; Ana-Paiva NUNES; Luísa FONSECA; Teresa PINHO-E-MELO; Miguel RODRIGUES; M-Luis SILVA; Bogdan CIOPLEIAS; Adela DIMITRIADE; Cristian FALUP-PECURARIU; May-Adel HAMID; Narayanaswamy VENKETASUBRAMANIAN; Georgi KRASTEV; Jozef HARING; Oscar AYO-MARTIN; Francisco HERNANDEZ-FERNANDEZ; Jordi BLASCO; Alejandro RODRÍGUEZ-VÁZQUEZ; Antonio CRUZ-CULEBRAS; Francisco MONICHE; Joan MONTANER; Soledad PEREZ-SANCHEZ; María-Jesús GARCÍA-SÁNCHEZ; Marta GUILLÁN-RODRÍGUEZ; Gianmarco BERNAVA; Manuel BOLOGNESE; Emmanuel CARRERA; Anchalee CHUROJANA; Ozlem AYKAC; Atilla-Özcan ÖZDEMIR; Arsida BAJRAMI; Songul SENADIM; Syed-I. HUSSAIN; Seby JOHN; Kailash KRISHNAN; Robert LENTHALL; Kaiz-S. ASIF; Kristine BELOW; Jose BILLER; Michael CHEN; Alex CHEBL; Marco COLASURDO; Alexandra CZAP; Adam-H. DE-HAVENON; Sushrut DHARMADHIKARI; Clifford-J. ESKEY; Mudassir FAROOQUI; Steven-K. FESKE; Nitin GOYAL; Kasey-B. GRIMMETT; Amy-K. GUZIK; Diogo-C. HAUSSEN; Majesta HOVINGH; Dinesh JILLELA; Peter-T. KAN; Rakesh KHATRI; Naim-N. KHOURY; Nicole-L. KILEY; Murali-K. KOLIKONDA; Stephanie LARA; Grace LI; Italo LINFANTE; Aaron-I. LOOCHTAN; Carlos-D. LOPEZ; Sarah LYCAN; Shailesh-S. MALE; Fadi NAHAB; Laith MAALI; Hesham-E. MASOUD; Jiangyong MIN; Santiago ORGETA-GUTIERREZ; Ghada-A. MOHAMED; Mahmoud MOHAMMADEN; Krishna NALLEBALLE; Yazan RADAIDEH; Pankajavalli RAMAKRISHNAN; Bliss RAYO-TARANTO; Diana-M. ROJAS-SOTO; Sean RULAND; Alexis-N. SIMPKINS; Sunil-A. SHETH; Amy-K. STAROSCIAK; Nicholas-E. TARLOV; Robert-A. TAYLOR; Barbara VOETSCH; Linda ZHANG; Hai-Quang DUONG; Viet-Phuong DAO; Huynh-Vu LE; Thong-Nhu PHAM; Mai-Duy TON; Anh-Duc TRAN; Osama-O. ZAIDAT; Paolo MACHI; Elisabeth DIRREN; Claudio RODRÍGUEZ-FERNÁNDEZ; Jorge ESCARTÍN-LÓPEZ; Jose-Carlos FERNÁNDEZ-FERRO; Niloofar MOHAMMADZADEH; Neil-C. SURYADEVARA,-MD; Beatriz DE-LA-CRUZ-FERNÁNDEZ; Filipe BESSA; Nina JANCAR; Megan BRADY; Dawn SCOZZARI.
Journal of Stroke ; : 256-265, 2022.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-938173

ABSTRACT

Background@#and Purpose Recent studies suggested an increased incidence of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We evaluated the volume of CVT hospitalization and in-hospital mortality during the 1st year of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the preceding year. @*Methods@#We conducted a cross-sectional retrospective study of 171 stroke centers from 49 countries. We recorded COVID-19 admission volumes, CVT hospitalization, and CVT in-hospital mortality from January 1, 2019, to May 31, 2021. CVT diagnoses were identified by International Classification of Disease-10 (ICD-10) codes or stroke databases. We additionally sought to compare the same metrics in the first 5 months of 2021 compared to the corresponding months in 2019 and 2020 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04934020). @*Results@#There were 2,313 CVT admissions across the 1-year pre-pandemic (2019) and pandemic year (2020); no differences in CVT volume or CVT mortality were observed. During the first 5 months of 2021, there was an increase in CVT volumes compared to 2019 (27.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 24.2 to 32.0; P<0.0001) and 2020 (41.4%; 95% CI, 37.0 to 46.0; P<0.0001). A COVID-19 diagnosis was present in 7.6% (132/1,738) of CVT hospitalizations. CVT was present in 0.04% (103/292,080) of COVID-19 hospitalizations. During the first pandemic year, CVT mortality was higher in patients who were COVID positive compared to COVID negative patients (8/53 [15.0%] vs. 41/910 [4.5%], P=0.004). There was an increase in CVT mortality during the first 5 months of pandemic years 2020 and 2021 compared to the first 5 months of the pre-pandemic year 2019 (2019 vs. 2020: 2.26% vs. 4.74%, P=0.05; 2019 vs. 2021: 2.26% vs. 4.99%, P=0.03). In the first 5 months of 2021, there were 26 cases of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), resulting in six deaths. @*Conclusions@#During the 1st year of the COVID-19 pandemic, CVT hospitalization volume and CVT in-hospital mortality did not change compared to the prior year. COVID-19 diagnosis was associated with higher CVT in-hospital mortality. During the first 5 months of 2021, there was an increase in CVT hospitalization volume and increase in CVT-related mortality, partially attributable to VITT.

2.
BEAT-Bulletin of Emrgency and Trauma. 2017; 5 (3): 171-178
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-188817

ABSTRACT

Objective: To demonstrate an architecture to automate the prehospital emergency process to categorize the specialized care according to the situation at the right time for reducing the patient mortality and morbidity


Methods: Prehospital emergency process were analyzed using existing prehospital management systems, frameworks and the extracted process were modeled using sequence diagram in Rational Rose software. System main agents were identified and modeled via component diagram, considering the main system actors and by logically dividing business functionalities, finally the conceptual architecture for prehospital emergency management was proposed. The proposed architecture was simulated using Anylogic simulation software. Anylogic Agent Model, State Chart and Process Model were used to model the system


Results: Multi agent systems [MAS] had a great success in distributed, complex and dynamic problem solving environments, and utilizing autonomous agents provides intelligent decision making capabilities. The proposed architecture presents prehospital management operations. The main identified agents are: EMS Center, Ambulance, Traffic Station, Healthcare Provider, Patient, Consultation Center, National Medical Record System and quality of service monitoring agent


Conclusion: In a critical condition like prehospital emergency we are coping with sophisticated processes like ambulance navigation health care provider and service assignment, consultation, recalling patients past medical history through a centralized EHR system and monitoring healthcare quality in a real-time manner. The main advantage of our work has been the multi agent system utilization. Our Future work will include proposed architecture implementation and evaluation of its impact on patient quality care improvement

3.
Healthcare Informatics Research ; : 307-314, 2015.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-165774

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Monitoring heart failure patients through continues assessment of sign and symptoms by information technology tools lead to large reduction in re-hospitalization. Agent technology is one of the strongest artificial intelligence areas; therefore, it can be expected to facilitate, accelerate, and improve health services especially in home care and telemedicine. The aim of this article is to provide an agent-based model for chronic heart failure (CHF) follow-up management. METHODS: This research was performed in 2013-2014 to determine appropriate scenarios and the data required to monitor and follow-up CHF patients, and then an agent-based model was designed. RESULTS: Agents in the proposed model perform the following tasks: medical data access, communication with other agents of the framework and intelligent data analysis, including medical data processing, reasoning, negotiation for decision-making, and learning capabilities. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed multi-agent system has ability to learn and thus improve itself. Implementation of this model with more and various interval times at a broader level could achieve better results. The proposed multi-agent system is no substitute for cardiologists, but it could assist them in decision-making.


Subject(s)
Humans , Artificial Intelligence , Follow-Up Studies , Health Information Systems , Health Services , Heart Failure , Heart , Home Care Services , Learning , Negotiating , Statistics as Topic , Telemedicine
4.
Healthcare Informatics Research ; : 162-166, 2013.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-167422

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Given the importance of the follow-up of chronic heart failure (CHF) patients to reduce common causes of re-admission and deterioration of their status that lead to imposing spiritual and physical costs on patients and society, modern technology tools should be used to the best advantage. The aim of this article is to explain key points which should be considered in designing an appropriate multi-agent system to improve CHF management. METHODS: In this literature review articles were searched with keywords like multi-agent system, heart failure, chronic disease management in Science Direct, Google Scholar and PubMed databases without regard to the year of publications. RESULTS: Agents are an innovation in the field of artificial intelligence. Because agents are capable of solving complex and dynamic health problems, to take full advantage of e-Health, the healthcare system must take steps to make use of this technology. Key factors in CHF management through a multi-agent system approach must be considered such as organization, confidentiality in general aspects and design and architecture points in specific aspects. CONCLUSIONS: Note that use of agent systems only with a technical view is associated with many problems. Hence, in delivering healthcare to CHF patients, considering social and human aspects is essential. It is obvious that identifying and resolving technical and non-technical challenges is vital in the successful implementation of this technology.


Subject(s)
Humans , Artificial Intelligence , Chronic Disease , Confidentiality , Delivery of Health Care , Disease Management , Follow-Up Studies , Heart , Heart Failure , Imidazoles , Nitro Compounds
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL