ABSTRACT
Diabetes is often associated with dysfunction in activities of daily living (ADL), especially among older adults.Hospitalisation of older adults is often followed by decline in functional status affecting their quality of life and well-beingafter discharge. The objective of this study was to determine the functional independence in carrying out basic activitiesof daily living, its relationship with quality of life, and the factors influencing the quality of life in hospitalised olderadults with diabetes. This cross sectional study was carried out on 104 diabetic patients (mean age: 67.5 ± 9.2 years) whowere receiving in-patient treatment. Face-to-face interviews were carried out to determine functional independence usingModified Barthel Index (MBI) as well as quality of life using the World Health Organization’s Quality of Life instrument(WHOQOL-BREF). Results showed that only 37.5% (n = 39) respondents were catergorised as being fully-independent.Among the domains in MBI, using the stairs recorded the lowest score followed by mobility. The physical domain in qualityof life also recorded the lowest score compared to other domains of quality of life. There were significant (p < 0.05),positive correlations between the overall MBI scores and all domains of quality of life; physical (rs = 0.70), psychology(rs = 0.50), social (rs = 0.33) and environmental (rs = 0.25). Hierachical multiple regression analysis showed MBI scoreshad significant influence on all domains of quality of life, with the largest influence on the physical domain i.e. 36% [F(1,92) = 82.14, p < 0.01, R2 = .36]. As a conclusion, hospitalisation reduces the functional independence in carrying outbasic activities of daily living as well as the physical aspect of quality life in older adults with diabetes. Therefore, it isimportant to provide rehabilitation in activities of daily living while the elderly diabetics while undergoing in-patienttreatment in order to maintain quality of life after discharge.
ABSTRACT
Stress is a common problem among university students and studies showed that involvement in exercise could help in reducing stress. However, information regarding the effect of high intensity progressive resistance training (PRT) using a resistant tube on stress among inactive and moderate active young male university students is limited. Hence, the aim of this study is to examine the effect of high intensity PRT using a resistant tube on psychological stress level, cortisol, DHEA and physical fitness in this population. A total of 30 male university students were participated in this quasi-experiment study. Intervention group (n = 14, age: 21.50 ± 1.37 yr) was participaned to carry out high intensity PRT by using resistant tube 3 times per week for 10 weeks; control group (n = 16, age: 21.29 ± 1.86 yr) was asked to continue their current lifestyle as usual. Before and after 10 weeks of intervention, psychological stress was measured by using PSS and SLSI questionnaires; cortisol and DHEA level were measured by using ELISA method. Timed up-and-go (TUG) used to examine dynamic balance and handgrip strength test used to measure muscle strength. Findings showed that the increased of DHEA level after 10 weeks of intervention was significantly difference between control and intervention groups (p < 0.05). There was no significant group difference in changes over time in anthropometric and body composition measurements, stress scores, cortisol level and physical fitness. High intensity PRT using resistant tube may be beneficial in increasing DHEA level among young male adults, which can act as a stress biochemical indicator.