Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Saude e pesqui. (Impr.) ; 12(3): 535-543, set/dez 2019.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1051490

ABSTRACT

O objetivo do presente estudo foi recalcular as dietas enterais semiartesanais padrões apresentados em uma Cartilha de Terapia Nutricional Enteral Domiciliar. Foram selecionadas as dietas 1.500, 1.800 e 2.100 kcal. Utilizaram-se três softwares de cálculo de dietas, Programa A, B, C, e cálculo manual com o auxílio de três referências bibliográficas. A dieta de 1.500 kcal pelo Programa A apresentou percentual de inadequação de -22,62%, Programa B -13,9%, Programa C +15,73% e pelo cálculo manual -1,1%. A dieta de 1.800 kcal apresentou no Programa A -26,6%, Programa B -15,6%, Programa C +11,17% e no cálculo manual -1,8%. A dieta de 2.100 kcal pelo Programa A -25,5%, Programa B -15,8%, Programa C +7,2% e no cálculo manual -4,8%. No estudo foi inviável reproduzir as dietas com auxílio do Programa A, B e C. O cálculo manual foi o método que mais se aproximou dos valores de oferta calórica apresentados pela cartilha.


Current analysis recalculates standard semi-amateur enteral diets given in a handout for Home Enteral Nutrition Therapy. Diets with 1,500, 1,800 and 2,100 kcal were selected. Three softwares for diet calculation were employed, namely, Program A, B, C, and a manual calculation, with the help of three bibliographical references. Diet 1,500 kcal of Program A had a non-adequacy percentage of -22.62%; Program B featured -13.9%; Program C featured +15.73%; manual calculation featured -1.1%. Diet 1,800 kcal features -6.6% in Program A; -15.6% in Program B; +11.17% in Program C; and -1.8% in manual calculation. Diet 2,100 kcal of Program A featured -25.5%; Program B featured -15.8%; Program C featured +7.2%; manual calculation featured -4.8%. Analysis showed unfeasibility of diets with Programs A, B and C. Manual calculation was the method that was closest to values of calorie calculation presented in the guideline.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL