ABSTRACT
OBJETIVOS: Estimar un modelo predictivo para la no-unión en pacientes que presentan fractura de tibia. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo, en pacientes con fractura de tibia operadas entre 2012 y 2018, con un mínimo de 12 meses de seguimiento, excluyendo amputaciones traumáticas. Realizamos un modelo de regresión logística con 13 variables descritas en la literatura. Se descartaron las variables estadísticamente no significativas y las que no causaban efecto de confusión. Se evaluó la bondad de ajuste mediante el test de Hosmer-Lemeshow y la discriminación del modelo con la curva ROC. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 411 fracturas de tibia, las variables estadísticamente significativas fueron: exposición ósea OR » 2,57(IC:1,155,75, p » 0,022), diabetes OR » 3,29 (IC:1,377,91, p » 0,008) y uso de tutor externo OR » 1,77(IC:0,813,85), el que tuvo efecto de confusión. La bondad de ajuste demostró que los datos se ajustan adecuadamente al modelo (p » 0,35). La curva ROC demuestra un 70,91% de poder discriminatorio. Al evaluar aisladamente las fracturas expuestas, no hubo asociación estadísticamente significativa con ninguna variable. DISCUSIÓN: Al evaluar el modelo, obtuvimos una asociación estadísticamente significativa entre: no unión, exposición ósea, diabetes y uso de tutor externo, información concordante con la literatura. Al estudiar el subgrupo de fracturas expuestas, las demás variables son estadísticamente no significativas. Eso refleja que la exposición ósea es la variable que confiere mayor riesgo. El seguimiento adecuado de esos pacientes es fundamental dado este alto riesgo de evolucionar con no-unión. CONCLUSIÓN: En nuestra serie, la exposición ósea es el factor de riesgo más importante para presentar no unión de tibia.
OBJECTIVES: Estimate a predictive model for non-union in patients presenting with a tibial fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study in patients with tibia fractures operated between 2012 and 2018, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months, excluding traumatic amputations. We performed a multivariate logistic regression model with 13 variables described in the literature. The variables that were statistically non-significant and those variables that do not cause confusion, were discarded. Goodness of fit was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and the discrimination of the model with the ROC curve. RESULTS: 411 tibial fractures were included, the statistically significant variables were: bone exposure OR » 2.57(CI:1.155.75, p » 0.022), diabetes OR » 3.29(CI:1.377.91, p » 0.008) and use of external fixation OR » 1.77(CI:0.813.85), being included in the model because of its confounding effect. Goodness of fit demonstrates that the data fit the model adequately(p » 0.35). The ROC curve demonstrates 70.91% discriminatory power. When evaluating the exposed fractures in isolation, there was no statistically significant association with any variable. DISCUSSION: When evaluating the model, we obtained a statistically significant association between non-union, bone exposure, diabetes and use of external fixation, being consistent with the literature. When studying the subset of exposed fractures, the other variables are statistically non-significant. This reflects that bone exposure is the variable that confers the greatest risk. Proper follow-up of these patients is essential given this high risk of evolving with non-union. CONCLUSION: In our series, bone exposure is the most important risk factor for presenting tibial non-union.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , Tibial Fractures/surgery , Fractures, Malunited/diagnosis , Tibial Fractures/physiopathology , Logistic Models , Multivariate Analysis , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , ROC Curve , Cohort Studies , Follow-Up StudiesABSTRACT
Background: In patients with hemophilia, radionuclide synoviorthesis, or the intra-articular injection of a radionuclide to decrease the synovial hypertrophy tissue, aims to decrease or avoid hemarthrosis. Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of radionuclide synoviorthesis in hemophilia. Material and Methods: Observational retrospective study of the evolution of 107 male patients aged 3 to 54 years who were subjected to radionuclide synoviorthesis between 2007 and 2015. Results: Of 164 treated joints, in 65% treatment was successful, (defined as zero to two hemarthroses and absence of synovitis during the follow up period), in 17% it was partially successful (defined as two or less hemarthroses, but persistence of the synovitis) and failed in 18% of the procedures. No important complications were recorded. Conclusions: Radionuclide synoviorthesis has an overall 82% success rate, is minimally invasive, can be used at any age and is inexpensive We recommend its implementation in Chilean hemophilia treatment centers.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Radioisotopes/administration & dosage , Rhenium/therapeutic use , Synovitis/therapy , Yttrium Radioisotopes/therapeutic use , Hemarthrosis/therapy , Hemophilia A/therapy , Synovitis/physiopathology , Synovitis/diagnostic imaging , Time Factors , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Hemarthrosis/physiopathology , Hemarthrosis/diagnostic imaging , Hemophilia A/physiopathology , Injections, Intra-ArticularABSTRACT
La exploración de los ejes carotideo y vertebral resulta sencilla técnicamente, con un aprendizaje relativamente rápido para el que inicia la actividad, especialmente si se establecen protocolos de exámenes estandarizados y fácilmente reproducibles. El objetivo de la sistematización en los servicios de Doppler vascular es que los exámenes realizados por distintos operadores sean similares en cuanto a la técnica y la terminología del informe; a nivel docente la sistematización ofrece al neófito una metodología clara a seguir con el fin de completar las evaluaciones y solidificar el proceso de aprendizaje.