Corneal backscatter in insulin-dependent and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients: a pilot study / Retroespalhamento luminoso das córneas de pacientes com diabete melito dependente e não dependente de insulina: estudo piloto

ABSTRACT Purpose: To compare central corneal backscatter obtained from Scheimpflug images between patients with insulin-dependent and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM and NIDDM, respectively) and healthy controls. Methods: Seven patients with IDDM (7 eyes), eleven patients with NIDDM (11 eyes), and sixteen healthy subjects (16 eyes) were included in this pilot study. Scheimpflug imaging system (Pentacam, Oculus Inc., Germany) was used to obtain optical sections of the cornea. Seven meridians were analyzed for each eye, oriented from 70° to 110°. Optical density values for the central 3-mm and 5-mm zones of the cornea were obtained by image analysis using external software. Results: Corneal backscatter was significantly higher in the diabetic patients than in the controls for the central 3-mm (p=0.016) and 5-mm (p=0.014) zones. No significant differences in corneal backscatter were found between the IDDM and NIDDM groups for either zone (both p>0.05). In the NIDDM group, significant correlations were observed for both central zones between corneal backscatter and age (3 mm: r=0.604, p=0.025; 5 mm: r=0.614, p=0.022) and central corneal thickness (3 mm: r=0.641, p=0.017; 5 mm: r=0.671, p=0.012); this was not found in the IDDM group (p>0.05). The presence of diabetes showed a significant effect on central corneal backscatter (Kruskal-Wallis test, p<0.001). Conclusions: Diabetic patients showed higher values of corneal light backscatter than healthy subjects. Corneal optical density analysis may be a useful tool for monitoring and assessing the ocular changes caused by diabetes.

RESUMO Objetivo: Determinar os valores de retroespalhamento luminoso central da córnea em pacientes diabéticos dependentes (IDDM) e não dependentes (NIDDM) de insulina, comparados com controles saudáveis, a partir de imagens de Scheimpflug. Métodos: Foram incluídos neste estudo piloto sete pacientes com IDDM (7 olhos), onze pacientes com NIDDM (11 olhos) e dezesseis indivíduos saudáveis (16 olhos). O sistema de Scheimpflug (Pentacam, Oculus Inc. Germany) foi utilizado para obter secções ópticas da córnea. Foram analisados sete meridianos para cada olho, orientados de 70º a 110º. A análise de imagem por meio de software externo permitiu a obtenção de valores da densidade óptica para os 3 e 5 mm centrais da córnea. Resultados: O retroespalhamento luminoso corneano foi significativamente maior em pacientes diabéticos para os 3 mm centrais (p=0,016) e para os 5 mm centrais (p=0,014) em relação ao grupo controle. Não foram encontradas diferenças significativas entre os grupos IDDM e NIDDM para cada zona analisada (p>0,05 em ambos os casos). No grupo NIDDM, observaram-se correlações significativas para as zonas centrais de 3 mm e 5 mm, entre retroespalhamento luminoso corneano e idade (r=0,604 p=0,025 e r=0,614 p=0,022, respectivamente) e espessura central corneana (r=0,641 p=0,017; r=0,671 p=0,012, respectivamente), o que não foi encontrado no grupo IDDM (p>0,05). O teste de Kruskall-Wallis indicou que a presença de diabete tem um efeito significativo sobre a retroespalhamento central da córnea (p<0,001). Conclusões: Pacientes diabéticos apresentaram valores mais elevados de retroespalhamento luminoso corneano do que indivíduos saudáveis. A análise da densidade óptica corneana pode ser uma ferramenta útil para monitorar e avaliar as alterações oculares causadas pela diabete.

Positional accommodative intraocular lens power error induced by the estimation of the corneal power and the effective lens position.

Purpose: To evaluate the predictability of the refractive correction achieved with a positional accommodating intraocular lenses (IOL) and to develop a potential optimization of it by minimizing the error associated with the keratometric estimation of the corneal power and by developing a predictive formula for the effective lens position (ELP). Materials and Methods: Clinical data from 25 eyes of 14 patients (age range, 52–77 years) and undergoing cataract surgery with implantation of the accommodating IOL Crystalens HD (Bausch and Lomb) were retrospectively reviewed. In all cases, the calculation of an adjusted IOL power (PIOLadj) based on Gaussian optics considering the residual refractive error was done using a variable keratometric index value (nkadj) for corneal power estimation with and without using an estimation algorithm for ELP obtained by multiple regression analysis (ELPadj). PIOLadj was compared to the real IOL power implanted (PIOLReal, calculated with the SRK‑T formula) and also to the values estimated by the Haigis, HofferQ, and Holladay I formulas. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between PIOLReal and PIOLadj when ELPadj was used (P = 0.10), with a range of agreement between calculations of 1.23 D. In contrast, PIOLReal was significantly higher when compared to PIOLadj without using ELPadj and also compared to the values estimated by the other formulas. Conclusions: Predictable refractive outcomes can be obtained with the accommodating IOL Crystalens HD using a variable keratometric index for corneal power estimation and by estimating ELP with an algorithm dependent on anatomical factors and age.