Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-200443

ABSTRACT

Background: Rational use of medicines promotes good health practices and prevents inappropriate use of medicines, polypharmacy, unnecessary use of antimicrobials, injections, and also encourages use of medicines from essential medicine list and dispensing by generic names. The aim of the study was to analyze the outpatient prescriptions of a tertiary care centre by utilizing World Health Organization (WHO) core drug use prescribing indicators.Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary care health setup at Puducherry, South India. Outpatient prescriptions from all the major clinical departments were analyzed using WHO prescribing indicators and they were compared with some similar studies.Results: The average number of drugs per prescription was 2.74. The percentage of prescriptions with antibiotics was 20.33% and the percentage of prescriptions with injections was 0.16%. The percentage of drugs prescribed by generic names and from essential medicine list was 83.13% and 87.9 respectively. Further antibiotic utilization was found to be higher in the department of ENT (56.67%), respiratory medicine (45%) and surgery (40%). Percentage of drugs prescribed by generic names in pediatrics and respiratory medicine were found to be 67.88% and 65.27% and percentage of drugs prescribed from essential medicine list in dermatology was 69.62%.Conclusions: Prescription pattern followed in our Institute almost adheres to the guidelines laid down by the WHO. Moreover, it is also implied that a routine audit of this type should be done in health care setups to ensure that they adhere to the WHO guidelines for better health care.

2.
SQUMJ-Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal. 2015; 15 (3): 340-345
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-169555

ABSTRACT

Ovarian cancer often goes undiagnosed or misdiagnosed in the early stages. The present study aimed to validate a modified version of the Goff Symptom Index [GSI] in an Indian population. This prospective case-control study was conducted between July 2010 and June 2012 in a university hospital in Manipal, Karnataka, India. A total of 305 inpatients admitted for ovarian pathology investigations and outpatients undergoing routine gynaecological check-ups were included in the study. The modified GSI [MGSI] was used to investigate the presence, severity, frequency and duration of 10 ovarian cancer symptoms on a scale of 1-5. Four additional symptoms were included with those of the original GSI [two symptoms from a previous MGSI and two new symptoms]. Patients were regarded as positive for ovarian cancer if symptoms occurred >12 times per month and time since onset was <1 year. Histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of ovarian tumours. A total of 13 patients were excluded. The final sample [n = 292] was divided into a test group [n = 74] and a control group [n = 218] based on histopathology. Within the controls, 144 women were found to have benign tumours. The MGSI was positive in 71.6% of the test group as opposed to only 11.5% of the control group. The addition of two symptoms [loss of appetite and weight] to the GSI increased the test's sensitivity from 71.6% to 77% without compromising specificity [88.5%].Based on these findings, the addition of two new symptoms [loss of appetite and weight] to the GSI is proposed in order to increase the test's sensitivity. However, the addition of urinary symptoms to the GSI requires further validation

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL