Standard setting of objective structured practical examination by modified Angoff method: A pilot study.

Background.The undergraduate curriculum at our institution is divided system-wise into four blocks, each block ending with theory and objective structured practical examination (OSPE). The OSPE in Physiology consists of 12 stations, and a conventional minimum score to qualify is 50%. We aimed to incorporate standard setting using the modified Angoff method in OSPE to differentiate the competent from the non-competent student and to explore the possibility of introducing standard setting in Physiology OSPE at our institution. Methods. Experts rated the OSPE using the modified Angoff method to obtain the standard set cut-off in two of the four blocks. We assessed the OSPE marks of 110 first year medical students. Chi-square test was used to compare the number of students who scored less than standard set cut-off and conventional cut-off; correlation coefficient was used to assess the relation between OSPE and theory marks in both blocks. Feedback was obtained from the experts. Results. The standard set was 62% and 67% for blocks II and III, respectively. The use of standard set cut-off resulted in 16.3% (n=18) and 22.7% (n=25) students being declared unsuccessful in blocks II and III, respectively. Comparison between the number, who scored less than standard set and conventional cut-off was statistically significant (p=0.001). The correlation coefficient was 0.65 (p=0.003) and 0.52 (p<0.001) in blocks II and III, respectively. The experts welcomed the idea of standard setting. Conclusion. Standard setting helped in differentiating the competent from the non-competent student, indicating that standard setting enhances the quality of OSPE as an assessment tool. Natl Med J India 2016;29:160–2

Exploring attributes of effective teachers - student perspectives from an Indian medical school.

Introduction: Attributes of an effective teacher is a passionate area of research for medical educators. Teaching at Melaka Manipal Medical College (MMMC), Manipal University, India, is assessed periodically as a part of the institution’s program evaluation process. The present study was undertaken to determine the highly rated attributes of a medical teacher, as felt by three batches (preclinical, para-clinical and clinical batch) of medical students at MMMC. Methods: A questionnaire focusing on twelve attributes of effective teaching was developed and administered to three batches of students. Students were requested to select the five most important attributes from the questionnaire and rank them accordingly as 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th. The responses were analyzed using cross tabulation and percentages of the grades provided by the participants were reported for each of the batch. Results: The ability of a teacher to motivate and inspire students was rated to be the best attribute of an effective teacher. Students also felt that defining objectives and clarifying concepts was an important quality that medical teachers should possess. The importance of being an effective communicator was also emphasized. Discussion: The present study underpins the need for a healthy teacher-student relationship in medical schools. Communication with international students in an Indian scenario may be a challenging task, keeping in mind the diverse cultural background of students. Probing qualities that students identify with an effective teacher may help us respond to these challenges.

Student and faculty perspectives on Laboratory Based Learning (LBL) sessions in Physiology.

Objective: To explore students’ and faculty members’ perspectives regarding LBL sessions-the gaps/pitfalls- to explore possibilities for improvement. Method: Two sets of questionnaires, one each for students and faculty members were developed and administered to the students of first year MBBS (n=113) and Faculty members of physiology department (n=13) of MMMC, Manipal. Both questionnaires had closed-ended questions (no negative statements) inviting responses in the form of Likert scale. Open-ended questions were included in the questionnaire distributed to faculty members. Quantitative analysis was done using SPSS version 16. Results: Students agreed to all items, with a median score of 4. Students’ responses clearly indicated that, in general, they were satisfied with conduction of LBL sessions in physiology, while, faculty members concurred with them with a median score of 4 for items other than student related and expressed that current LBL sessions were adequate for MBBS curriculum. Faculty members were of the opinion that students need to practice more in LBL sessions. They also suggested inclusion of additional teaching aids in LBL sessions. Conclusion: Majority of students and faculty members were satisfied with the content and methodology employed in the current laboratory based sessions in physiology. Some of the suggestions given by students and faculty members could be easily implemented for improving the process, while others require additional infrastructure and logistic support.