ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the attractiveness, acceptability, visibility and willingness-to-pay for clear aligner therapy (CAT) systems in first-year and final-year dental students and instructors. Methods: A questionnaire designed to collect information regarding esthetic preferences and intentions related to seven CAT systems was handed out to 120 undergraduate students and instructors at the Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA). Proportional odds models and population average generalized estimating equation models were used to examine potential association between participant characteristics, esthetic perceptions and CAT systems. Results: Overall, the examined CAT systems received favorable esthetic ratings. Expertise status was significantly associated with willingness-to-pay additionally for CAT, compared to fixed orthodontic appliances. There was no association between sex, previous orthodontic treatment history, satisfaction with own dental appearance and potential interest in treatment and aligner visibility and willingness-to-pay. CAT system was significantly associated with the perceived aligner visibility, acceptability and attractiveness by students and instructors. Conclusions: CAT systems were considered to a great extent attractive and acceptable for future treatment by dental school instructors and students. Willingness-to-pay for CAT systems was significantly associated with expertise status, with instructors appearing more reluctant to pay for CAT.
RESUMO Objetivo: Comparar diferentes sistemas de tratamento com alinhadores transparentes (CAT), quanto à atratividade, aceitabilidade, visibilidade e disposição a pagar, por parte de alunos (primeiro e último anos) e instrutores de Odontologia. Métodos: Um questionário elaborado para coletar informações sobre preferências e intenções estéticas, em relação a sete sistemas CAT, foi distribuído para 120 alunos de graduação e instrutores do Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA). Modelos de riscos proporcionais e modelos de equação de estimação generalizada para a média da população foram usados para examinar a possível associação entre as características dos participantes, percepções estéticas e os sistemas CAT. Resultados: No geral, os sistemas CAT examinados receberam avaliações estéticas favoráveis. O nível de experiência foi significativamente associado com a disposição em pagar mais por sistemas CAT do que por aparelhos ortodônticos fixos. Não houve associação entre sexo, histórico de tratamento ortodôntico anterior, satisfação com a própria aparência dentária, potencial interesse em tratamento, visibilidade do alinhador e disposição em pagar mais. Os sistemas CAT foram significativamente associados à visibilidade percebida, aceitabilidade e atratividade dos alinhadores por alunos e instrutores. Conclusões: Os sistemas CAT foram considerados, em grande parte, atraentes e aceitáveis para tratamentos futuros pelos instrutores e alunos do curso de Odontologia. A disposição em pagar mais pelos sistemas CAT foi significativamente associada ao nível de especialização, com os instrutores parecendo mais relutantes em pagar mais pelo CAT.
ABSTRACT
Abstract: During the COVID-19 pandemic the use of cloth masks has increased dramatically due to the shortage of medical masks. However, the efficiency of this material is controversial. We aimed to investigate the efficiency of cloth masks in reducing transmission and contamination by droplets and aerosols for the general population and healthcare workers. Electronic databases were searched without year or language restrictions. Clinical and laboratorial studies were included. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using an adapted quality checklist for laboratory-based studies. ROBINS-I tool and Cochrane RoB 2.0 were used to evaluate non-randomized (n-RCT) and randomized clinical trials (RCT), respectively. The quality of the evidence was assessed through GRADE tool. From the eleven studies selected, eight were laboratory-based studies, one non-randomized and one RCT supported by laboratory data. Between the evaluated fabrics only three presented a filtration efficiency > 90%. Hybrid of cotton/chiffon (95%CI 95.2 to 98.8), hybrid of cotton/silk (95%CI 92.2 to 95.8) and cotton quilt (95%CI 94.2 to 97.8). However, cloth masks are not recommended for healthcare workers. A meta-analysis was not feasible due to a high methodological heterogeneity. The overall quality of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. Despite the lower efficiency compared to medical masks, laboratorial results may underestimate the efficiency of cloth masks in real life. Cloth mask efficiency is higher when made of hybrid fabrics (cotton/chiffon, cotton/silk) and cotton quilt, mainly with multiple layers.