Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Pakistan Oral and Dental Journal. 2016; 36 (1): 99-104
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-179057

ABSTRACT

Study was done to evaluate and compare the impact strength of reattached fractured incisor tooth using five different adhesive materials 1] Composite 2] Giomer 3] Dual Cure Resin Cement 4] Resin Modified GIC 5] Compomer


Ninety sound freshly extracted human permanent incisors were selected according to the inclusion criteria. 15 teeth were taken as a control [Group I] and remaining 75 teeth were divided equally and randomly into five Groups; Group II - Composite, Group III - Giomer, Group IV- Dual Cure Resin Cement, Group V - Resin Modified GIC, Group VI - Compomer based upon the materials to be used for reattachment. The specimen teeth in the experimental groups were fractured by Custom-made vice. The fractured fragments were reattached using their respective adhesive materials. Then the impact resistance was recorded in an impact testing machine and data was analyzed


On comparing the mean impact strength by using One Way ANOVA and Unpaired 't' test it was observed that statistically highly significant difference was present when comparison was made between mean impact strength of intact teeth and reattached fractured teeth


Statistically highly significant difference was obtained on comparing impact strength of intact tooth with reattached tooth using adhesive materials. So, no material studied was able to attain the impact strength of intact tooth. However, when materials were compared, decreasing order of their impact strength was Compomer > Composite > Dual Cure Resin Cement > Giomer > Resin Modified GIC


Subject(s)
Tooth, Impacted , Incisor , In Vitro Techniques , Dental Bonding , Dental Materials , Resin Cements , Composite Resins
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL