Pupil cycle time and contrast sensitivity in type II diabetes mellitus patients: A pilot study.

Context: Pupil cycle time (PCT) has been widely used for examination of ocular diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN). Aims: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the difference of contrast sensitivity according to PCT results, and the secondary aim was to determine the factors associated with PCT difference for type II diabetes patients. Settings and Design: A clinical pilot study that included a total of 60 eyes of 60 type II diabetes patients. Materials and Methods: We divided all patients into three groups according to PCT results. Group A and Group C were composed of patients who had upper one third PCT and lower one third PCT, respectively. We analyzed difference of age, diabetes duration, hypertension duration, mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), mean spherical equivalent (SE), HbA1C, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), stage of diabetic retinopathy, and Cardiac Autonomic Function Score (CAFS). Contrast sensitivity and decrease of visual acuity by glare were also estimated and analyzed for 28 eyes of 28 non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) patients. Group [NPDR] A and Group [NPDR] C were defined as those who had lower one third PCT and upper one third PCT, respectively. Statistical Analysis: Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 17.0 software. Results and Conclusions: Each group contained 20 eyes. Significant differences between Group A and Group C were observed in duration of diabetes and CAFS (P ≤ 0.001 and P <0.001, respectively). Contrast sensitivity in Group [NPDR] A was significantly more than in Group [NPDR] C at all cpds (all P ≤ 0.001). We found that PCT can influence contrast sensitivity or glare in diabetes patients and also confirmed a significant correlation of PCT with CAFS and duration of diabetes.

Risk Factors of Dislocation Occurring after Acetabular Component Revision

Purpose: To analyze the causes and to prevent dislocations of the hip joint that occur in patients who underwent revisions of total hip arthroplasties by changing only the polyethylene liners and femoral heads, subsequent to primary total hip arthroplasties. Materials and Methods: We evaluated 28 patients who underwent acetabular component revisions of total hip arthroplasties subsequent to primary total hip arthroplasties. The average age of the patients was 55 years old and all 28 patients had operations through the posterolateral approach. In 17 of the cases, the acetabular cups, polyethylene liners, and femoral heads were changed; in 10 cases, just the polyethylene liners and femoral heads were changed; and in 1 case, only the polyethylene liner was changed. Results: We observed 7 cases of hip dislocations that occurred among a total of 28 cases after revisions of total hip arthroplasties. In all 7 cases, the polyethylene liners and femoral heads were changed, but not the acetabular cups. In additional, in all 7 cases of dislocation, the patients were non-compliant and started weight-bearing prematurely after revisions of the total hip arthroplasties Conclusion: We observed new dislocations in the 7 cases in which the polyethylene liners and femoral heads were changed. The main reasons were inadequate soft tissue tension and hip joint laxity. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the neck length, use elevated rim polyethylene liners, readjust the acetabular cups to their optimal positions, and apply hip abduction braces to patients early after revision of total hip arthroplasties in order to lessen the danger of dislocations.