ABSTRACT
Background: Contraception is the intentional use of artificial methods or other techniques to prevent pregnancy as a consequence of sexual intercourse. Progesterone only injectables are highly effective in preventing in pregnancy as they do not rely on daily usage of contraceptions as such as oral contraceptive pills and barrier methods. Injection depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) is an effective contraceptive method in lactating mother and postabortal patients. Aims and Objectives: The aims of this study were to study utilization pattern, acceptance, effectiveness, and adverse effects of DMPA in postpartum and postabortal women. Materials and Methods: It was a prospective and observational single-center study and was conducted at tertiary care teaching hospital. The data were collected in patient received Inj. DMPA 150 mg intra muscularly immediately after abortion and delivery before discharge. The follow-up was done after administration of DMPA (usually every 3 months). Results: In this study, 56 (53.34%) patients were in the age group of 18–25 years, while 38 (36.19%) patients were 26–35 years whereas 11 (10.47%) were more than 36 years. Out of 105 patients, 12 patients were administered only one injection, 16 patients administered two injections and 16 patients given three injections of DMPA. Common adverse effects of DMPA are irregular bleeding (43.8%), amenorrhea (22.8%), and heavy bleeding (5.7%). Out of 24 patient who developed amenorrhea after injections of DMPA, total 11 patients had amenorrhea after fourth injection, 5 patients after first injection, and 2 patients after second injection of DMPA. Average time for return of fertility after last injection of DMPA was 9 months. Conclusion: DMPA is very effective contraceptive and apart from menstrual troubles that there are no significant major side (weight gain, mood changes, etc.) effects related to its use. DMPA may cause a delay in the return of fertility, the return of fertility takes 7–10 months from date of last injection, but it is completely reversible.
ABSTRACT
Background: Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is an important and catastrophic complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). Kidney disease has heterogeneity in histology in diabetes patients and includes both diabetic kidney disease (DKD) (albuminuric or nonalbuminuric) and nondiabetic kidney disease (NDKD) either in isolation or in coexistence with DN. Diabetic nephropathy is hard to overturn. While NDKD is treatable and reversible. Materials and methods: We enrolled a total of 50 type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with clinical kidney disease, of both genders and age >18 years, who underwent kidney biopsy from October 2016 to October 2018. Patients with proteinuria <30 mg per day were excluded from the study. The indications of the renal biopsy were nephrotic syndrome (NS), active urinary sediment, rapid decline in renal function, asymptomatic proteinuria, and hematuria. Result: A total of 50 (males: 42 and females: eight) patients with T2DM who underwent kidney biopsy were enrolled. The clinical presentation was: NS 26 (52%), chronic kidney disease (CKD) 11 (22%), asymptomatic proteinuria and hematuria six (12%), acute kidney injury (AKI) four (8%), and acute nephritic syndrome (ANS) three (6%). Diabetic retinopathy (DR) was noted in 19 (38%) cases. Kidney biopsy revealed isolated DN, isolated NDKD, and NDKD superimposed on DN in 26 (52%), 14 (28%), and 10 (20%) cases, respectively. Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (MN) (4) and amyloidosis (2) were the most common forms of NDKD, whereas diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis (DPGN) was the main form of NDKD superimposed on DN. Diabetic nephropathy was observed in 15 (79%) cases in presence of DR and also in 11 (35.5%) cases even in absence of DR. Of eight patients with microalbuminuria four (50%) cases have biopsy-proven DN. Conclusion: About 48% of patients had NDKD either in isolation or in coexistence with DN. Diabetic nephropathy was found in absence of DR and in patients with a low level of proteinuria. The level of proteinuria and presence of DR does not help to distinguish DN vs NDKD. Hence, renal biopsy may be useful in selected T2DM patients with clinical kidney disease to diagnose NDKD.