ABSTRACT
Breast cancer has been considered a female dominated disease. Carcinoma of male breast is a rare disease representing 1% of all breast cancers and less than 1 % of all cancers in men. The mean age at presentation is mainly in sixties. We here present a case of male breast cancer presented at very young age of 29 years, diagnosed on fine needle aspiration which was confirmed later on histopathological examination.
ABSTRACT
Background: Reproductive tract infection represents major public health problem in developing countries. Cervical infections are common problems among women of reproductive age and associated with clinical complaints of vaginal discharge. Pap smear is a screening test to diagnose various abnormal pathology of cervix. Aims and objectives of this study was to identify various causes of vaginal discharge and frequency of various pathogenic microorganisms in cervical smear.Methods: This was hospital based descriptive study carried out on 300 female patients who attended obstetrics and gynecology clinic at tertiary care hospital with compliant of vaginal discharge. Cervical smear samples were collected, conventional smears were prepared by trained technical staff and stained using Papanicolaou (Pap) technique.Results: The most common age group affected with vaginal discharge was 26 to 35 years with 115 cases. The most common associated symptom was lower abdominal pain seen in 75 cases. Most frequent findings on per speculum examination was thick whitish discharge in 186 cases and the most common pathogenic organism found was Bacterial Vaginosis (BV) in 177 cases.Conclusions: The study emphasizes the need for educating women of rural community to raise the awareness for cervical Pap screening.
ABSTRACT
Erdheim–Chester disease (ECD) is a rare, non-inherited, non- Langerhans form of histiocytosis of unknown origin, first described in 1930. This entity is defined by a mononuclear infiltrate consisting of lipid laden, foamy histiocytes that stain positively for CD68. Individuals affected by this disease are typically adults between their 4th and 6th decades of life. The multi systemic form of ECD is associated with significant morbidity, which may arise due to histiocytic infiltration of critical organ systems. Among the more common sites of involvement are the skeleton, central nervous system, cardiovascular system, lungs, kidneys (retroperitoneum) and skin. The most common presenting symptom of ECD is bone pain. Bilateral symmetric increased tracer uptake on 99mTc bone scintigraphy affecting the periarticular regions of the long bones is highly suggestive of ECD. However, definite diagnosis of ECD is established only once CD68(+), CD1a(−) histiocytes are identified within a biopsy specimen with aid of clinical and radiological data. Here we present a rare case of Erdheim-Chester disease in a 46 year male patient based on clinical data, radiological data, histopathological and immunohistochemistry findings.
ABSTRACT
Background: Reticulocytes are young or immature red blood cells released from bone marrow and that contain remanants of ribonucleic acid (RNA) and ribosomes. Reticulocyte count (RC) is the index of erythropoietic activity within bone marrow. The reticulocyte counting methods at clinical laboratories are currently divided into manual and automated.Methods: A total of 500 samples of study cases were processed by manual method using New Methylene Blue (NMB) and automated method based on flowcytometry by PENTRA XLR HORIBA hematology analyzer. All quality control parameters were evaluated and values obtained by both methods were compared using various statistical methods.Results: Automated hematology analyzer provides excellent precision and linearity with no significant carryover. On comparing manual and automated RC method good method correlation was found (correlation coefficient r-0.865), however individual case wise percent deviation between manual and automated RC and CRC varied significantly. In addition within run precision calculated for automated RC differed significantly from manual count. The mean of difference between duplicate readings (150 samples) of manual and automated RC (<5%) were 0.3 and 0.01 respectively while 6.3 and 0.15 respectively for >5% RC. Thus, automated method was found to be more precise than the manual RC.Conclusions: The manual count method for RC associated with significant imprecision compared to flowcytometric method mostly based on interobserver variation and the smaller number of cell being counted. In contrast, the automated method is rapid, easy to operate, count higher number of cells with precise measurement.