Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
2.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-171457

ABSTRACT

In the present study, we studied the various reasons for conversion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy; and recommended various methods and measures to decrease the incidence of conversion and associated complications with this procedure. One hundred and seventy six patients in age group of 20-55 years, M:F ratio as 1:9 with body weight in range of 45-65 kilogram, who were having cholelithiasis without choledocholithiasis and contraindication for general anaesthesia underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy between Jan 2002 and Dec 2003. There were a total of ten surgeons performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy out of which two surgeons had experience of more than 200 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Twenty one patients (11.93%) out of a total of one hundred and seventy six (11.93%) had to be converted to open cholecystectomy for reasons which included dense omental or visceral adhesions- 5(2.84%), postoperative adhesions with parieties and viscera (intestines) - 3 (1.70%), uncontrollable bleeding from liver bed - 3 (1.70%), uncontrollable bleeding from cystic artery - 2(1.14%) unclear anatomy - 2(1.1.4%), cholecysteoduodenal fistula - 1(0.57%), common bile duct injury - 1 (0.57%), cirrhotic liver with shrunken gallbladder - 1(0.57%), spillage of stone - 1(0.57%), pneumoperitoneum related complications - 1(0.57%), instrument/equipment failure - 1 (0.57%). Good Laparoscopic skill, adequate experience and innovations are prerequisites for safe and cost-effective laparoscopic cholecystectomy thereby reducing conversion rate.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL