ABSTRACT
Background: Medical professionals (MPs) are facing stress, sleep deprivation, and burnout due to pandemic-related high patient inflow and consistent work shifts. Yoga and meditation are feasible, cost-effective, evidence-based, and well-accepted tools having multifold mental and physical health benefits. Design: In this ongoing open-label single-arm trial, we assessed changes in sleep, heart rate variability (HRV), and vitals before and after a 4-day online breath meditation workshop (OBMW) among 41 MPs at a tertiary care hospital in northern India during COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Outcomes were assessed at baseline and after the 4-day workshop using a ballistocardiography-based contactless health monitoring device. The workshop was conducted online. Two participants were excluded due to a lack of adherence. Results: A highly significant increase was seen in total sleep duration (p = 0.000) and duration of deep sleep (p = 0.001), rapid eye movement (REM) sleep (p = 0.000), and light sleep (p = 0.032). HRV outcomes of the standard deviation of normal-to-normal R-R intervals (SDNN) and root mean square of successive differences between adjacent normal heartbeat (RMSSD) also improved significantly (p = 0.000) while heart rate reduced significantly (p = 0.001). No significant change was observed in breath rate, total time awake, or in the low-frequency by high-frequency (LF/HF) spectrum of HRV. Conclusion: Four days of OBMW improved sleep and HRV among MPs, strengthening the fact that yoga and meditation can help induce psychophysical relaxation and prove to be an effective tool to combat stress and sleep deprivation. As the stakeholders in patient care, that is, MPs are healthy, it will further improve patient care and reduce the chance of medical errors.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The frailty index’s potential as a prognostic marker of sepsis is so far been untapped. Here we studied the predictive value of frailty index in the elderly with sepsis. Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary level hospital in North India. The duration of the study was 18 months starting from January 2020 to July 2021. The frailty index was calculated along with traditional markers of sepsis such as sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA), and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) within 24 hours of admission in elderly patients suspected to have sepsis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of frailty index, SOFA, qSOFA, and SIRS was compared for in-hospital and 3-month mortality. Results: There was no significant difference between the performance of the frailty index and SOFA (DeLong’s test p = 0.242) in predicting in-hospital mortality, but there was a statistical difference between the AUROC of SOFA score (AUC = 0.548) and frailty in predicting 3-month mortality (DeLong’s test p ?0.001). Conclusion: The frailty index had greater sensitivity and negative predictive value among the other scores in predicting in-hospital mortality, whereas SOFA had higher specificity in predicting in-hospital mortality. The frailty index was superior to SOFA and the other prognostic markers of sepsis in predicting 3-month mortality.