ABSTRACT
Surface plays a crucial role in biological interactions. Surface treatments have been applied to metallic biomaterials in order to improve their wear properties, corrosion resistance, and biocompatibility. A systematic review was performed on studies investigating the effects of implant surface treatments on biocompatibility. We searched the literature using PubMed, electronic databases from 1990 to 2009. Key words such as implant surface topography, surface roughness, surface treatment, surface characteristics, and surface coatings were used. The search was restricted to English language articles published from 1990 to December 2009. Additionally, a manual search in the major dental implant journals was performed. When considering studies, clinical studies were preferred followed by histological human studies, animal studies, and in vitro studies. A total of 115 articles were selected after elimination: clinical studies, 24; human histomorphometric studies, 11; animal histomorphometric studies, 46; in vitro studies, 34. The following observations were made in this review: The focus has shifted from surface roughness to surface chemistry and a combination of chemical manipulations on the porous structure. More investigations are done regarding surface coatings. Bone response to almost all the surface treatments was favorable. Future trend is focused on the development of osteogenic implant surfaces. Limitation of this study is that we tried to give a broader overview related to implant surface treatments. It does not give any conclusion regarding the best biocompatible implant surface treatment investigated till date. Unfortunately, the eventually selected studies were too heterogeneous for inference of data.
ABSTRACT
Context: Clinical and laboratory studies regarding performance of recently introduced luting cements: Adhesive resin cement and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GIC), are limited. Aims: To compare the retention and marginal seating of Ni-Cr alloy restorations using newer luting cements: Resin-modified GIC and adhesive resin cement with those of the oldest cement, zinc phosphate. Materials and Methods: Thirty maxillary premolars of similar sizes were prepared to receive cast metal copings. Copings were placed on the prepared teeth and the marginal opening was examined using a Nikon Measuroscope. The specimens were randomly assigned to three groups. Group I castings were luted with zinc phosphate, Group II castings luted with resin-modified GIC, and Group III castings luted with adhesive resin cement. After cementation marginal seating was measured. Tensile loads required to dislodge the crowns were obtained using MTS machine. Statistical Analysis Used: Tukey's test, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Results: For zinc phosphate cement, mean marginal seating was 31 microns. Mean retentive strength was 287 Newtons. For resin-modified GIC, mean marginal seating was 29.6 microns. Mean retentive strength was 610 Newtons. For adhesive resin cement, mean marginal seating was 49 microns. Mean retentive strength was 613 Newtons. Conclusions: Marginal seating of adhesive resin cement was significantly greater than that of zinc phosphate and resin-modified GIC. Retentive strength of adhesive resin cement and resin-modified GIC was significantly greater than that of zinc phosphate There was no significant difference of retentive strength between adhesive resin cement and resin-modified GIC.
ABSTRACT
For a patient with xerostomia, wearing dentures can be an extremely uncomfortable experience. To relieve patient’s complaints from xerostomia, mucin-containing artificial saliva has been developed long back. Different techniques have been proposed for incorporating reservoirs in the dentures, containing salivary substitutes, in the dentures. A new design for a split- reservoir denture is described in this article that maximizes capacity and is easy to clean by the wearer and was produced from routine denture materials.