ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the treatment effect and security of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE)combined with sorafinib for intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.Methods From July 2008 to November 2010,the treatment effects of two groups of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed and compared,including 44 patients treated by sorafenib combined with TACE(test group)and the other 44 patients treated only with TACE(control group).To assess the treatment effect based on mRECIST,the time for patients' tumor progression(TTP),overall survival(OS)time and adverse events were recorded.Survival rate were analyzed using KaplanMeier method and Log-rank analysis in SPSS 18.0.Results Till January 2011,24 patients(54.5％)survived and 20 patients(include patients lost to visit)died(45.5％)among the test group,13 patients survived(29.5 ％)and 31 patients(include patients lost to visit)died(70.5 ％)among the control group.No complete remission condition was observed in all patients.Among the test group,1 patient got partial remission,24 ones remain stable and 19 patients got progression.While among the control group,conditions remained stable in 21 patients and progressed in rest 23 ones.The disease control rate(DCR)in the test group and control group were 56.8％(25/44)and 47.7％(21/44)respectively,with no statistical significance(x2 =0.729,P =0.393).The median overall survival time(mOS)of test group and control group were 21.0(95 ％ CI:14.9-27.1)months and 10.0(95 ％ CI:6.4-13.6)months respectively,and the difference reached statistical significance(x2 =7.436,P =0.006).The median time to tumor progression(mTTP)of test group and control group was 1 1.0(95％ CI:8.7-13.3)and 6.0(95％ CI:3.9-8.1)months respectively,and the difference had statistical significance(x2 =10.437,P =0.001).The adverse events of test group mainly included hand-foot skin reaction,loss of appetite,fever,fatigue and diarrhea.The adverse events of control group mainly included fever,loss of appetite,nausea,vomiting and fatigue.The incidences of hand-foot skin reaction,baldness,diarrhea were significantly higher in test group than those in the control group(P ＜0.05).In most patients,these side effects were mild-to-moderate,and alleviated remarkablely after symptomatic treatment.Conclusions Compared with TACE alone,TACE combined with sorafenib can prolong the OS and TTP significantly for the patients with intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.However,the DCR of the two groups has no statistical significance.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To establish a reasonable protocol for interventional treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The data of 1 000 HCC patients treated by different kinds of interventional treatment were reviewed with their results of biochemistry, imaging, pathology and survival rate evaluated. The value as well as the pros and cons of these various kinds of interventional treatment were compared in order to find an optimum protocol.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Segmental-transcatheter oil chemoembolization (S-TOCE) was much effective eradicate the tumor yet inflicting less damage on the noncancerous hepatic tissue and giving much higher survival rate than the conventional transcatheter oil chemoembolization (C-TOCE). Percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) played an important role in eradicating the residual tumor and improving the survival rate without damaging the noncancerous hepatic tissue. The survival quality or survival rate could be improved by choosing different ways of interventional treatments to cut down the complications.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The selection of different interventional treatments should be done according to the size and type of HCC. Active management is indicated for different complications presenting along with HCC.</p>