Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
International Eye Science ; (12): 997-1001, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-924220

ABSTRACT

@#AIM: To observe the clinical therapeutic efficacy of Ahmed glaucoma valve(AGV)implantation with intravitreal injection of aflibercept or ranibizumab in patients with neovascular glaucoma(NVG). <p>METHODS: A retrospective study. The clinical data of 33 cases(33 eyes)with NVG angle-closure glaucoma who were received intravitreal injection of aflibercept or ranibizumab with AGV implantation from January 2018 to August 2020 in our hospital were involved in this study. There were 18 eyes in the aflibercept group and 15 eyes in the ranibizumab group. All patients were followed-up for 6mo. The best-corrected visual acuity(BCVA), intraocular pressure, neovascularization, and postoperative complications were recorded and evaluated.<p>RESULTS: Before the first intravitreal injection and 1wk after intravitreal injection, the differences of intraocular pressure and BCVA in two groups were not statistically significant(<i>P</i>>0.05); The changes of intraocular pressure and BCVA before the first intravitreal injection and after AGV implant 1wk, 1, 3, 6mo were statistically significant in two groups(<i>P</i><0.01), but there were no statistically significant differences intraocular pressure and BCVA between the two groups at each follow-up time point(<i>P</i>>0.05). There were no significant differences in average number of injections between aflibercept group(1.61±0.98)and ranibizumab group(1.80±0.86)(<i>P</i>>0.05). The differences of neovascular recurrence rate, incidence of early and late complications and surgical success rates were not statistically significant(<i>P</i>>0.05).<p>CONCLUSION: Intravitreal aflibercept or ranibizumab injection combined with AGV implantation is an effective treatment for NVG. The clinical efficacy of aflibercept and ranibizumab were similar.

2.
International Eye Science ; (12): 870-874, 2022.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-923430

ABSTRACT

@#AIM: To analyze the epidemiological characteristics of patients hospitalized for ocular trauma during the novel coronavirus(COVID-19)epidemic. <p>METHODS: A retrospective case analysis. Totally 876 cases(905 eyes)of ocular trauma were analyzed in this study, including 545 cases(565 eyes)from January to June 2019 were enrolled ascontrol group, and 331 cases(340 eyes)from January to June 2020 were enrolled in the research group. Information regarding age, sex, location of injury, cause of injury, place of residence, and type of injury were collected and analyzed.<p>RESULTS: The number of hospitalisation for ocular trauma in the research group decreased by 39.3% compared with the control group. The age distribution of patients showed a double peak, at 0-10 years(20.55%, 21.45%)and 41-50 years(17.98%, 19.03%)in the control group and research group, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the age distribution between the two groups(<i>P</i>=0.907). Men were predominantly injured in both the control and the research groups, accounting for 80.37% and 83.69%, respectively(<i>P</i>=0.219). The proportion of home injuries in the research group(28.40%)was higher than the control group(11.38%)(<i>P</i><0.001). The proportion of mechanical eye injuries in the research group(98.19%)was higher than the control group(95.60%)(<i>P</i>=0.041), and the proportion of open globe injuries(85.54%)was also higher than the control group(76.58%)(<i>P</i>=0.001). The proportion of patients with no light perception in the research group(18.86%)was higher than that of the control group(9.53%)(<i>P</i><0.001).<p>CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 epidemic period, the total number of ocular trauma cases was significantly reduced. Mechanical eye injuries are still the main type for hospitalisation of patients with eye injuries. The awareness of eye injury prevention should be strengthened during the period of epidemic.

3.
Chinese Journal of Experimental Ophthalmology ; (12): 239-241, 2012.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-635620

ABSTRACT

BackgroundWhether the peeling of the inner limiting membrane (ILMP) increase the closure rate of idiopathic macular hole is still in controversy.Some ophthalmologist recommend vitrectomy combined with inner limiting membrane peeling for the treatment of idiopathic macular hole.However,the removal of ILMP is difficult because of its similar appearance to adjacent tissues.Objective This study was to investigate the efficacy of triamcinolone acetonide(TA) and indocyanine green(ICG) double staining-assisted vitrectomy combined with ILM peeling during the surgery.Methods A consecutive case- observational study was designed.The standardized vitrectomy was performed in 25 eye of 23 cases with IMH.During the vitrectomy,TA and ICG were injected into posterior pole vitreous to visualize and assist the ILM peeling.The dying effectiveness was observed,and the closure rate of macular hole,visual acuity,intraocular pressure and complications were evaluated after surgery.Written informed consent was obtained from each patient prior to operation.Results Posterior vitreous cortex and ILM were visible and the residual vitreous and cortex were removed clearly after dying of TA and ICG in all the 25 eyes.During the following-up duration of 3-8 months,the completely anatomical reattachment of the macular area was in 22 eyes ( 88.0% ) and partially reattachment in 3 eyes( 12.0% ).The best corrected vision was 0.07-0.60 in all of the operated eyes 2 months after surgery.Conclusions TA and ICG- assisted vitrectomy combined with ILM peeling appears to be a safe and effective method for IMH repair.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL