ABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Brazilian version of the Suicide Crisis Inventory-2 (SCI-2) among Brazilian adults. Methods: The SCI-2 was cross-culturally adapted into Portuguese and administered to 2,265 Brazilian participants. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to assess factor structure, internal consistency, convergent validity, and criterion validity by using measures such as suicidal narratives, stressful life events, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts. Results: The revised one-factor model of the SCI-2 demonstrated an adequate, although not optimal, model fit (χ2[1539] = 31,442.79, p < 0.001, comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.99, Tucker-Lewis index [TLI] = 0.99, root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.09, standardized root mean residual [SRMR] = 0.05). The revised five-factor model, on the other hand, demonstrated good fit (χ2[1529] = 14,174.86, p < 0.001, CFI = 1.00, TLI = 1.00, RMSEA = 0.06, SRMR = 0.04). Comparison of these two models indicated that the five-factor model had a better fit than the one-factor model. Both the total and subscale scores of the SCI-2 showed strong internal consistency and good convergent and criterion validity in relation to stressful life events, suicidal narratives (excluding the goal disengagement subscale), suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the Brazilian version of the SCI-2 is a valid tool for assessing symptoms of suicidal crisis syndrome.
ABSTRACT
Objetivo: avaliar a qualidade de vida (QV) de estudantes universitários durante a pandemia da COVID-19 em Santa Catarina, Brasil. Método: estudo observacional transversal com abordagem quantitativa, realizado entre junho e dezembro de 2021 em uma universidade particular de Santa Catarina, Brasil. Foi utilizado um questionário sociodemográfico e WHOQOL-bref. Resultados: dentre os 310 estudantes avaliados, a maioria era do sexo feminino (80,1%), branca (89,7%) e solteira (81,9%). Os domínios físico e psicológico foram afetados significativamente (p < 0,001) quando comparados aos demais domínios. Estudantes do período noturno e vespertino foram mais afetados quando comparados ao período integral nos domínios relações sociais (p = 0,047), meio ambiente (p < 0,001) e geral (p = 0,023). Sofreram maior impacto psicológico, aqueles que residiam com crianças e idosos quando comparados aos que residiam apenas com idosos (p = 0,023). Conclusão: a pandemia da COVID-19 afetou significativamente a QV dos estudantes analisados. Os impactos negativos nos estudantes foram observados conforme o período de estudo e perfil sociodemográfico.
Objective: to assess university students' quality of life (QL) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: this is a observational cross-sectional survey with a quantitative approach carried out between June and December 2021 at a private university in Santa Catarina, Brazil, through an online form. A sociodemographic test and WHOQOL-bref were used for QoL analysis. Results: among the 310 evaluated students, 80.1% were female, 89.7% were white and 81.9% were single. The physical and psychological domains were significantly affected (p < 0.001). Night-time and afternoon-time students were more affected when compared to full-time students in the social relationships (p = 0.047), environment (p<0.001) and general (p = 0.023) domains. Moreover, students who lived with children and the elderly suffered a more significant psychological impact when compared to those who lived only with the elderly (p = 0.023). Conclusion: the COVID-19 pandemic significantly affected the QL of academics, mainly in the Physical and Psychological domains. Moreover, negative effects on students were observed according to the period of study and sociodemographic profile.