Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) and mini-mental state examination (MMSE) as screening tools for cognitive impairment among patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease: A descriptive study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the scores of patients with idiopathic Parkinson's Disease using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mini-Mental State Examination in a tertiary hospital BACKGROUND: Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder diagnosed clinically based on the signs of resting tremor bradykinesia, rigidity and loss of postural reflexes. According to Bassett et al, 20% to 40% of PD patients ultimately become demented with an incidence of 10% per year. Cognitive decline is an impotant predictor of dementia in PD. Almost all patients with PD suffer from selective cognitive impairments including difficulties with attention, concentration, planning, sequencing, concept formation, problem solving, set-shifting and memory which are thought ro reflect dysfunction of cortical circuits subserving frontal brain regions. Identification of cognitive impairment in PD is crucial. It predicts future cognitive decline and may eventually be a target for pharmacologic intervention to prevent or delay the development of dementia. METHODS: A descriptive study. A convenience sampling of 95 patients with idiopathic Patkinson's disease were screened for cognitive impairment. RESULTS: Mean MMSE and MoCA scores were 26.1 (SD 2.9) and 19.8 (SD 4.28). Based on the published cutoff scores for cognitive impairment for Parkinson's Disease, 72% of the participants scored 26/30 and below on MoCA whereas only 42% scored 26/30 and below on the MMSE. Impairments were seen in numerous cognitive domains including executive function, language, recent semantic memory, visuo-spatial processing and constructional praxis. Predictors of cognitive impairment on the MoCA include low level of education and older age. CONCLUSIONS: MoCA was able to detect more cognitive impairments in patients with Parkinson's disease than MMSE. Therefore, MoCA is a better screening tool to detect cognitive impairments in PD patients.

SigN-PQ neuropathic pain questionnaire development and validation in English and Filipino languages

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop and validate a simple questionnaire for chronic neuropathic pain that can be administered as a screening tool by general practitioners and internists in order to help them identify patients with probable neuropathic pain. METHODS: Following a development phase and a pilot study, the revised version of the screening tool which included eleven descriptors associated with neuropathic pain both in English and Filipino languages was validated on 120 consecutive patients with any type of pain except psychogenic pain, recruited in the out-patient clinics of six hospitals. The questionnaire was validated by assessing the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of each item and the overall questionnaire. The internal consistency of the questionnaire items was assessed using the Kuder-Richardson formula 20. RESULTS: Overall, the internal consistency of the SigN-PQ using the Kuder-Richardson formula 20 was 0.7837; the sensitivity was 91.89% with specificity of 80.22%, PV (+) was 65.38% and PV(-) was 96.0%. For the English version, the descriptors with the highest scores were burning (Sensitivity: 100%, Specificity: 93%) and electricity-like (Sensitivity: 100%, Specificity: 93%). For the Filipino version, mainit (burning) has the highest sensitivity of 88% with specificity of 82.6%, followed by gumagapang (tingling) with sensitivity of 86.96% and specificity of 85.42%. The sensation of saksak (stabbing) and hiwa (lancinating) have the lowest sensitivity, 60% and 54% respectively, although their specificity scores are high. Since this study is a validation of a screening tool for neuropathic pain, the investigators decided to choose descriptors with higher sensitivity. Thus, in the final version of the SignN-PQ, the descriptors saksak and hiwa were removed. CONCLUSION: The SigN-PQ Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire has a high overall sensitivity of 91.89% and specificity of 80.22%. The pain descriptors in the questionnaire are consistent with the descriptors cited in the literature. It is a valid screening instrument for neuropathic pain that can be easily incorporated in the daily practice of general practitioners and internists.