Barriers to up take cataract surgery in Gandaki Zone, Nepal.

OBJECTIVE: Cataract though avoidable remains as leading cause of blindness in Nepal. Though, Himalaya Eye Hospital rendering high quality surgical service through its base hospital and out reach service in Gandaki Zone having cataract surgical rate is below 1500 per million. Therefore, it is mater of interest to investigate the reason and the finding would be helpful to plan the future cataract programme to CSR to desirable level, if we know the reason(s) that forced them living as blind in community and not seeking available surgical services. METHOD: All person with cataract affecting their visual acuity to <6/60 (corrected) in either eye found in stratified cluster design sampling were enrolled in the study. They were interviewed with structured questionnaire investigating their knowledge and attitude of their visual impairment and barriers for not seeking cataract surgical service to date. RESULTS: A total of 303 eligible subjects were enrolled in the study. Out of them 57.8% of people knew about the cataract and they also think their vision impairment is due to cataract. But 56.11% of people were not aware their vision will improve. Surgical camp attendant or operated patients were found to be effective media to spread the message that the cataract is curable. Among the barriers: fear for surgery 31.1%, lack of attendant and geographical distance 32.8%, financial 24.1% and other clinical reason were found to be 12% as a reason for not seeking available surgical service. CONCLUSION: The cataract service marketing, eye health education disseminating the information on cataract and its curability is not found to be adequate. Therefore, the future cataract programme should give more concentration on creating awareness on cataract and subsidizing the available surgical service and service need to be brought to more proximity for the needy poor people.

Nutrition education and mega-dose vitamin A supplementation in Nepal.

Two approaches to improve vitamin A nutriture are compared: nutrition education and mega-dose capsule distribution. The impact of these programmes on vitamin A deficiency (VAD), wasting malnutrition, and excessive childhood mortality are compared for approximately 40,000 children who were assigned to either intervention cohorts or a control group from 75 sites within seven districts in two ecological settings (Terai, or lowland, and hills) of Nepal. Twenty-four months after the implementation of the project, the reduction of risk of xerophthalmia was greater among children of mothers who were able to identify vitamin A-rich foods [relative risk (RR) = 0.25; 95% CI = 0.10-0.62] than among children who received mega-dose capsules (RR = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.41-0.84). The risk of mortality at two years was reduced for both the nutrition education cohort (RR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.48-0.86) and capsule distribution cohort (RR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.42-0.77). The nutrition education program, however, was more expensive to deliver than the capsule distribution programme. High rates of participation in the supplementation programme were achieved within a short period. The nutrition education message spread rapidly throughout the study population, although practice was slower to change. Where maternal literacy was low and channels of communication were limited, the capsule programme appeared to be more cost-effective. However, economies of scale for nationwide programmes exist for nutrition education programmes that do not exist for capsule distribution programmes. A comprehensive national programme requires both dietary supplementation and nutrition education.