Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Salud ment ; 30(5): 47-54, Sep.-Oct. 2007.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-986041

ABSTRACT

resumen está disponible en el texto completo


Summary: Action of GABA agonists and antagonists on memory. The θ rhythm. Muscimol may directly alter memory. Recently, a modified matching to position (MTP) paradigm was employed aimed at influencing the type of associations a rat may use to solve the task. The main behavioral manipulation was the application of a differential outcomes procedure (DOP). DOP implies correlating each event to be remembered with a different reward condition. This procedure will result in the development of specific reward expectations which will in turn increase and guide choice behavior. Such different reward expectations will not be present when the reward assignation used is either common or random (non-differential outcomes procedure, NOP). Intraventricular infusion of muscimol or CSF in rats carrying out a delayed MTP using either a MOP or an NOP protocol will affect both groups of rats, but the nature of the deficit will differ depending on the reinforcement contingencies. Rats trained in DOP will show general non-mnemonic damage independent of delay, i.e., performance will be affected at all delay intervals employed. On the contrary, rats trained in NOP will show delay-dependent damage. This appears to demonstrate that muscimol may also have untoward memory effects, which further indicates that activation of GABA receptors will affect a set of memory associations and functions. Difficulties experienced in the past regarding LTP induction at the level of the CA3-CA1 synapse using time-based spike presentation protocols have been disconcerting given the preeminence of these synapses as a model system for the study of synaptic plasticity. Results previously discussed in experiments using picrotoxin as a GABA inhibitor have suggested that such difficulties arise from the requirement that, for LTP to be induced, CA1 dendrites must be persistently and totally activated. Doublets used in this case represent a minimal burst, or level of post-synaptic stimulation for LTP induction that subsumes greater depolarizations. In vitro, synaptically induced bursts would correspond to regenerative electrical events in apical dendrites of pyramidal neurons. The same requirements for dendritic activation would be satisfied in vivo during the θ rhythm, which is present during active exploration. Therefore, GABA might serve as an engram modulator through the activation of the hippocampal θ rhythm. Effect of μ-opioid receptors on hippocampal memory activity. Hippocampal μ-opioid receptors (MOR) have been involved in the formation of memory associated with the abuse of opioid drugs. When chronically activated, and during programmed drug abstinence, MORs acutely modulate hippocampal synaptic plasticity At the level of neuronal networks, MORs increase excitability of area CA1 by means of a disinhibition of pyramidal cells. The specific inhibitory interneuronal subtypes which become affected by activation of MORs are not known. Nevertheless, not all subtypes are inhibited and some subtypes preferentially express these receptors. In one study, the effect of activation of MORs on inhibitory patterns and propagation of excitatory activity in CA1 of rat hippocampus was investigated through cortical images created using voltage-sensitive dyes. MOR activation increased excitatory activity originated by the increased stimulating input to stratum oriens (i.e., Schäffer collateral and commissural [SCC] fibers, as well as the retrograde pathway), to stratum radiatum (i.e., SCC fibers) and to stratum lacunosum-moleculare (i.e., the perforant pathway and the thalamus). Increased excitatory activity was additionally facilitated by propagation through the neural network of area CA1. This was observed as a proportionally greater increment of amplitudes of excitatory activity in sites distant from the originally evoked activity. Such facilitation was noted in excitatory activity propagating from three sites of stimulation. The increment and facilitation were prevented with GABAA receptor antagonists (bicuculline, 30 μM), but not with GABAB receptor antagonists (CGP, 10 μM). Besides, MOR activation inhibited inhibitory post-synaptic potentials (IPSPs) in every layer of area CA1. These findings suggest that MOR-originated suppression of GABA release to GABAA receptors increases every type of input to pyramidal CA1 neurons and facilitates propagation of excitatory activity through the neural network of area CA1. Cannabis indica and memory. Cannabinoids (derived from Cannabis indica, or marihuana) disturb memory processes in mammalians. In spite of the fact that the neuronal cannabinoid CB1 receptor was identified several years ago, the neuronal network mechanisms mediating these effects are still controversial. Tritium-labeled GABA-releasing experiments have been used to test for the localization of this receptor at a cellular and subcellular level in the human hippocampus. CB1 expression detected with this technique is limited to hippocampal interneurons, most of which, it could be determined, are cholecystokinin-containing basket neurons. The CB1-positive neuronal somata show immune staining of their cytoplasm, but not of their somatodendritic plasma membrane. CB1-immunoreactive axonic terminals densely cover the entire hippocampus and form symmetrical synapses, characteristic of GABAergic neuronal boutons. It could thus be observed that WIN 55,212-2, a CB1-receptor agonist, considerably reduces the release of tritium-labeled GABA, and that this effect is preventable using the receptor antagonist, SR 141716A. This single pattern of expression and pre-synaptic modulation of GABA release suggests the existence of a preserved role of CB1 receptors in the control of inhibitory hippocampal networks responsible for the generation and maintenance of fast and slow oscillation patterns. Therefore, a probable mechanism whereby cannabinoids could affect associational processes in memory might be a disturbance of synchrony of rhythmical events in distinct neuronal populations. GABA effects against aging. Certain components which stimulate GABAergic neurotransmission might prevent the hippocampal and striatal degeneration which typically appears with old age and causes memory deterioration. On using a 4-vessel occlusion model in animals to study the effect of ischemia on expression of GABAA receptor subunits, which are vulnerable in region CA1 and resistant in region CA3 of Amnion's horn, an increment in expression of GABAA2, GABA B2, GABA G2 units and a decrement in expression of GABA A1 and GABA A3 subunits in region CA3 were obtained. On the contrary, there was no change in region CA1 or the dentate gyrus under the same conditions. These data speak in favor of the stimulation of type 2 receptor GABAergic subunits which might protect certain hippocampal areas against a harmful neurodegenerative effect, for example, of memory activities during old age.

2.
Salud ment ; 30(4): 7-15, jul.-ago. 2007.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-986025

ABSTRACT

resumen está disponible en el texto completo


Summary: Introduction. The entire hippocampus is derived from the telencephalon. Embryologically, it is made up of the most archaic cortices. Through special phylogenetic and ontogenetic telencephalization processes, it will arrive at its particular mesial basal position. This structure has three components: a) Retrocommisural hippocampus, or hippocampus proper (RH). b) Supracommisural hippocampus (SH). c) Precommisural hippocampus (PH). The RH is situated in the most medial part of the 5th temporal gyrus (5 TG). The outer/upper face of the RH is to be found in the temporal recess of the lateral ventricle. It is called pes hippocampi or albeus. Inwards, it is limited by the choroid fissure, outwards and downwards by the parenchyma of the 5th TG, forwards, by the amygdala of the striatal body and, backwards, by the isthmus. The fornix is a continuation of efferent pathways from CA3, CA1 and the subiculum. By means of a circular course, it ascends over the thalamus and, descending in front of Monro's foramina and traversing the hypothalamus, reaches the mammillary bodies. It consists of fimbria, posterior pillars and a body and anterior pillars. The latter pass behind the anterior white commisure (AWC), and make up the anterior portion of Monro's foramina. The SH originates in the RH. At the level of the splenium of the corpus callosum (CC), the fornix produces two striae, medial and lateral, and the dentate gyrus turns from fasciola cineria into induceum griseum. These structures are to be found in both hemispheres and, traveling over the CC, will reach the preoptic and hypothalamic septal areas, as well as the PH. The PH is a small fiber contingent which stems from the fornix at the level and in front of the AWC. Memory. General aspects. There is general agreement that the main role of the hippocampus is that of creating new memories relative to experienced events (episodic or autobiographic memory). Some researchers, however, prefer to think of the hippocampus as part of a major medial temporal lobe memory system responsible for declarative memory. This memory would include, besides episodic memory, memory of events. Another very important hippocampal function would relate to storage of semantic (conceptual) memories. Engrams. Memory and synaptic plasticity. Engrams are hypothetical means whereby memory traces are stored as physical or chemical changes in the brain in response to external stimuli. The existence of engrams has been proposed by diverse scientific theories which try to explain the persistence of memory and how some memories are stored in the brain. The term engram was coined by Sermon and explored by Pavlov Lashley tried to locate the engram and failed in finding a sole biological locus for the same which made him think that memories were not localized in any particular part of the brain, but distributed throughout the cerebral cortex. Afterwards, in 1949, Hebb, a student of Lashley's, published his empiricist theories in The Organization of Behavior. Hebb referred to Lorente de Nó's reverberating circuits to propose a mechanism for maintaining activity in the cerebral cortex after the external stimulus had ceased: the so called central autonomous process. This led him to consider the cellular assembly, a complex reverberating circuit which could be assembled by experience. Changes in synaptic resistance with experience were eventually named Hebb's, or the Hebbian, synapse. Hebbian theory describes a basic mechanism for synaptic plasticity by means of which an increment in synaptic efficacy stems from repetitive and persistent stimulation of the post-synaptic cell. This theory receives the name of Hebb's rule. The fact that memory is persistent stresses the relevance of understanding those factors which maintain synaptic strength and prevent undesired synaptic changes. There is evidence that recurrent inhibitory connections in region CA1 of Ammon's horn of the hippocampus might contribute in this sense by modulating the ability to induce long-term potentiation (LTP) or long-term depression (LTD) of synaptic activity, given by a sequence of high-or low-frequency stimulations, respectively. The hippocampus seems to be able to select the most relevant from the least relevant aspects of a definite experience in order to transform them into long-term memory. According to the concept of Emotional Tagging, for example, through the activation of the amygdala by emotionally suggestive events, the experience will be tagged as important and synaptic plasticity promoted in other cerebral regions, such as the hippocampus. Recently, it has been shown that activation of the amygdala transforms transient plasticity into long-term plasticity. This finding directly relates to the afore mentioned hypothesis of emotional tagging, since activation of this organ could trigger neuromodulatory systems, further reduce the activation threshold of the synaptic marker and facilitate transformation of early into late memory at the level of the hippocampus via direct amygdalar action on the latter organ. γ-aminobutyric acid. γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), together with its different receptor subunits, functions as an inhibitor neurotrans-mitter in hippocampus and memory activities. GABA and memory. LTP has been a widely studied mechanism of synaptic plasticity and, as we have mentioned, it is intimately related to diverse memory and learning processes in mammals. It has been observed in pyramidal cells of area CA1 of the hippocampus of young C57BL/6 mice that the pairing of pre-synaptic stimulation with just one post-synaptic action potential will be sufficient to induce LTP, whereas in the adult animal this stimulation must be paired with several post-synaptic action potentials to achieve such induction. This change might result from a modification during maturation of GABAergic inhibitory processes. A bath of muscimol, a GABAA agonist, given to sections of hippocampal area CA1 will increase the range of frequencies inducing LTD, while in the presence of picrotoxin, a GABAA antagonist, LTD will be induced only at very low stimulation frequencies. The resulting recurrent inhibition appears to stem from GABAergic input to pyramidal neurons of CA1. In this way, post-synaptic spike activity could increase GABAergic feedback inhibition, and thus favor LTD. However, in experiments in which the pairing of stimulating action potentials is set apart in time, LTD, LTP or no plasticity may be observed. An explanation for these results could be that, in the presence of picrotoxin, and therefore GABA inhibition, the first action potential may have a greater tendency to "back propagate", so that only one spike would be enough to cause LTP instead of LTD, and affect memory processes differently.

3.
Salud ment ; 29(1): 51-55, ene.-feb. 2006.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-985936

ABSTRACT

Resumen: Los neurotransmisores de la amígdala en el sistema límbico comprenden, entre otros, a las monoaminas (noradrenalina [NA]), la acetilcolina (ACh), los corticoides y la histamina. Ciertas drogas infundidas a la amígdala podrían modular la consolidación en la memoria de la inhibición del entrenamiento dirigido a evitar situaciones de estrés. La administración de anta gonistas de los receptores de la β NA en la amígdala afecta la retención en la memoria por un lapso de un día cuando se administra inmediatamente después del entrenamiento, pero no surte ningún efecto cuando se administra a las seis horas. Infusiones intraamigdalinas de NA acompañadas de antagonistas de aquellos receptores atenuarán el trastorno mnemónico. De manera importante, se ha podido determinar que la NA produce un incremento de la consolidación de la memoria, que depende tanto del tiempo como de la dosis de aplicación cuando el fármaco se infunde a la amígdala inmediatamente después de la inhibición de este tipo de entrenamiento. La amígdala, la neocorteza y el hipocampo son regiones meta del sistema cerebral frontal basal colinérgico, que se relaciona estrechamente con diversas funciones del aprendizaje y la memo ria. Cualquier neurotransmisor con actividad fosforiladora o desfosforiladora podrá regular el estado de sensibilidad a la ACh, así como las propiedades funcionales de las neuronas amigdalinas. Es posible, entonces, que exista una modulación entre los estados de aprendizaje y de recuerdo de lo aprendido en la amígdala, la neocorteza y el hipocampo que esté regida por receptores muscarínicos acetilcolinérgicos. Por medio de receptores presinápticos de la histamina 3 (H3) y un mecanismo por el momento aún desconocido, la histamina disminuye o aumenta la transmisión sináptica excitadora en el BLA. Tal modulación histaminérgica de la actividad neuronal cumple un papel importante en los procesos fisiológicos y patofisiológicos del miedo, el aprendizaje y la memoria de la emo ción y los trastornos afectivos.


Abstract: Neurotransmitters of the amygdala in the limbic system include monoamines (noradrenaline [NA]) acetylcholine (ACh), corticoids and histamine. Drugs infused into the amygdala may modulate consolidation in memory of inhibition of training directed to avoid stressful situations. Administration of antagonists of β NA receptors to the amygdala will affect retention in memory for a whole day when given immediately after training, but will have no effect when given six hours after training a test animal. Intra-amygdalar infusions of NA which may be accompanied by antagonists of those receptors will attenuate the memory disturbance. It is worth mentioning that later studies have been able to show that NA will produce an increment of memory consolidation, which will depend on the time as well as on the dose of application, when the drug is infused to the amygdala shortly after inhibition of training directed to avoid stressful situations. The amygdala, the neocortex and the hippocampus are target regions of the frontal basal cholinergic brain system, which has different effects on cognitive functions, such as memory and learning. Any neurotransmitter with phosphorylating or dephosphorylating activity may regulate the sensitive state of ACh, as well as the functional properties of amygdalar neurons. It is possible, then, that modulation mechanisms may exist between learning and recall states in the amygdala, the neocortex and the hippocampus, which could be controlled by muscarinic acetylcholinergic receptors. Through pre-synaptic receptors of histamine 3 (H3) and a currently unknown mechanism, histamine will decrease or increase excitatory synaptic transmission in BLA. Such histaminergic modulation of neuronal activity will play an important role in fear-related physiological and patho-physiological processes, learning and memory of emotion, and affective disturbances.

4.
Salud ment ; 28(6): 27-32, nov.-dic. 2005.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-985923

ABSTRACT

Resumen Los neurotransmisores de la amígdala en el sistema límbico comprenden, entre otros, al ácido γ-aminobutírico (GABAA,B,G), el ácido glutámico (GLU) y el N-metil-D-aspartato (NMDA), así como a las monoaminas [dopamina (DA) e hidroxitriptamina (5-HT)]. El GABA es el principal neurotransmisor inhibidor. Su actividad inhibidora se bloquea, por ejemplo, por los efectos ansiolíticos de las benzodiacepinas, tanto en la amígdala como en otros centros del sistema límbico (tálamo, corteza prefrontal, hipocampo, etc.) conectados con esta estructura. Igualmente, la corteza prefrontal cerebral regula los procesos de memoria en los que esté involucrado un componente afectivo a través de conexiones inhibidoras GABAérgicas sobre el núcleo lateral (LA) de la amígdala. Al estimularse las vías córtico-amigdalinas y tálamo-amigdalinas, se produce una excitación seguida de una inhibición mediadas por receptores del GABA en el LA. Una reducción de la inhibición puede obtenerse ya sea al estimular conjuntamente ambas vías, o al estimular primero una y luego la otra vía. Ambos tipos de depresión se regulan por inhibidores presinápticos del GABAB en interneuronas del LA que conectan con el núcleo central (CE) de la amígdala, y que aparentemente llegan por una u otra vía. Este dato apoya la existencia de un ingreso monosináptico convergente de información al LA, ingreso que interviene en la respuesta a diferentes condiciones estresantes y que limita una actividad neuronal excesiva. El GLU es el principal neurotransmisor excitador. Al estimularse la amígdala durante la aversión condicionada contra ciertos sabores por este neurotransmisor, se produce una inhibición de la actividad hipotalámica procedente de vías GABAérgicas amigdalinas que van al hipotálamo. El LA es parte del circuito neural que subyace al condicionamiento pavloviano al miedo. En este circuito, el bloqueo de los receptores de NMDA glutámicos en el LA antes del entrenamiento altera el aprendizaje del condicionamiento al miedo, pero el bloqueo previo a la prueba también altera dicha expresión. Se ha visto que un bloqueo específico causa una disrupción del circuito que interviene en el aprendizaje de este condicionamiento, mas no de la consolidación en la memoria del proceso en un momento posterior al aprendizaje. La estimulación de los colículos inferiores (CI) causa un aumento significativo de los niveles de DA en la corteza prefrontal (PFC). Asimismo, el complejo basolateral de la amígdala (BLA) sirve como filtro de la información con carga negativa que promueve el escape y que asciende a estructuras más elevadas del tallo cerebral. Se ha observado que la desactivación del BLA interfiere con la activación de los egresos dopaminérgicos corticales producidos por una estimulación con carga negativa de los CI. Se ha podido demostrar que la información con carga negativa que asciende desde los CI cursa con una modulación opuesta dada por mecanismos de DA/5-HT que descienden desde la PFC. Estos procesos parecen regularse por filtros localizados en el BLA. Existe la posibilidad de que la DA proveniente del BLA module las respuestas de la DA del nucleus accumbens durante el estrés indirectamente por medio de conexiones de la primera con la corteza prefrontal medial, la cual inhibirá, por medio de la DA, la transmisión dopaminérgica de este núcleo.


Summary Neurotransmitters of the amygdala in the limbic system include, among others, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABAA,B.G), glutamic acid (GLU) and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), as well as the monoamines [dopamine (DA) and 5-hydroxytriptamine (5-HT)]. GABA is the main inhibitory neurotransmitter. Its inhibitory activity will be blocked, for example, by the anxiolytic effects of benzodiazepines both in the amygdala and in other nuclei of the limbic system (thalamus, prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, etc.) connected to this structure. Similarly, the cerebral prefrontal cortex will regulate memory and learning processes in which an affective component may be involved through GABAergic inhibitory connections reaching the lateral nucleus (LA) of the amygdala. On stimulating cortico- and thalamo-amygdalar pathways, an excitation will be produced followed by an inhibition, both of which are mediated by GABA receptors in LA. A reduction of the second inhibition may be obtained either by joint stimulation of both pathways or by stimulation of the first and then the other pathway. Both types of depression can be regulated by presynaptic inhibitors of GABAB in LA interneurons connecting with the central nucleus of the amygdala, and which apparently arrive via either the cortical or the thalamic pathway. These data support the existence of a convergent monosynaptic information input which will be active in response to different stressful conditions, and which will limit excessive neuronal activity. GLU is the main excitatory neurotransmitter. When the amygdala is excited in the course of aversive conditioning against certain flavors by this neurotransmitter, a further inhibition of hypothalamic activity will be produced arriving via GABAergic amygdalar pathways to the hypothalamus. LA is part of the neural circuit underlying pavlovian fear conditioning. In this circuit, blocking glutamate NMDA receptors in LA before training will alter acquisition of fear conditioning, but blocking this nucleus before testing will also alter such expression. Recent research has shown that blocking will cause specific disruption of the circuits participating in fear learning, and not of memory consolidation of this process some time after learning. Stimulation of the inferior colliculi (IC) will cause a significant increment of DA levels in prefrontal cortex (PFC). Likewise, the basolateral complex (BLA) of the amygdala will serve as a filter of aversive information ascending to upper structures of the brainstem. In this regard, it has been observed that deactivation of BLA will interfere with activation of cortical dopaminergic outputs produced by aversive stimulation arriving from the IC. Aversive information ascending from the IC has been shown to be modulated by DA/5-HT mechanisms descending from PFC. These processes appear to be regulated by filters located in BLA. In the same fashion, there is the possibility that DA from the basolateral amygdala may modulate responses of DA from the nucleus accumbens during stress indirectly via connections of the amygdala with the PFC, which will inhibit, again, via DA, dopaminergic transmission of the nucleus accumbens.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL