ABSTRACT
Objective: To investigate the predictive value of serum E2 in early diagnosis of pregnancy through IVF-ET(in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer). Methods: Sixty-two patients (75 cycles involved) undergoing IVF-ET cycles, whose infertility was attributed to uterine tube or male factors, were enrolled. Luteal phase serum E2 was detected every other day after extraction of oocytes with micro-particle enzyme immunoassay. Results: The level of serum E2 declined progressively after extraction of oocytes in both pregnant and non-pregnant cycles, while it showed no significant difference on 2, 4, 6, 8 days after extraction of oocytes. In pregnant cycles following IVF-ET, serum E2 achieved the nadir on day 10 and then increased gradually. The differences of serum E2 levels in pregnant and non-pregnant cycles were detectable from day 10 after extraction of oocytes (816.4+ 537.6 vs. 189.5±69.3 pg/ml) (P＜0.05). In non-pregnant cycles, E2 on day 10 was significantly lower than that on day 8 ( 189.5+ 69.3 vs. 989.2+581.5 pg/ml) (P＜0.05). Conclusions: We concluded that the level of E2 on day 8 and 10 consecutively after extraction of oocytes may have predictive value in diagnosing early pregnancy. Ascension of serum E2 level of pregnant patients on day 10 forebodes the success of pregnancy, or else the failure of pregnancy.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To investigate the predictive value of serum E2 in early diagnosis of pregnancy through IVF-ET(in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer). Methods: Sixty-two patients (75 cycles involved) undergoing IVF-ET cycles, whose infertility was attributed to uterine tube or male factors, were enrolled. Luteal phase serum E2 was detected every other day after extraction of oocytes with micro-particle enzyme immunoassay. Results: The level of serum E2 declined progressively after extraction of oocytes in both pregnant and non-pregnant cycles, while it showed no significant difference on 2, 4, 6, 8 days after extraction of oocytes. In pregnant cycles following IVF-ET, serum E2 achieved the nadir on day 10 and then increased gradually. The differences of serum E2 levels in pregnant and non-pregnant cycles were detectable from day 10 after extraction of oocytes (816.4+ 537.6 vs. 189.5±69.3 pg/ml) (P＜0.05). In non-pregnant cycles, E2 on day 10 was significantly lower than that on day 8 ( 189.5+ 69.3 vs. 989.2+581.5 pg/ml) (P＜0.05). Conclusions: We concluded that the level of E2 on day 8 and 10 consecutively after extraction of oocytes may have predictive value in diagnosing early pregnancy. Ascension of serum E2 level of pregnant patients on day 10 forebodes the success of pregnancy, or else the failure of pregnancy.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To check the expression of leukemia inhibitory factor (Lif) mRNA, and to study the impact of ovarian stimulation on the ability of embryo implantation in mice.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Pregnancy models of mice were established. The relationship between the implantation of ovarian stimulated embryos and the expression of Lif mRNA in mice metrium was analyzed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The group of recipients which the transfered embryos were from stimulated cycles had lower pregnancy and implantation rate compared with the group of recipients which the transfered embryos were from non-stimulated cycles (20.00%, 8.33% vs 55.00%, 35.00%). The Lif mRNA expression was similar in the groups of recipients which the transfered embryos were from stimulated and non-stimulated cycles, so was in the groups of recipients which had single or more than one baby, but higher in the group of pregnancy recipients than in the group of unpregnancy recipients.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Ovarian stimulation may reduce the ability of embryo implantation in mice. Lif mRNA expression is related to the implantation, but not parallel to the number of implantation.</p>