Neuroligins Differentially Mediate Subtype-Specific Synapse Formation in Pyramidal Neurons and Interneurons / 神经科学通报·英文版

Neuroligins (NLs) are postsynaptic cell-adhesion proteins that play important roles in synapse formation and the excitatory-inhibitory balance. They have been associated with autism in both human genetic and animal model studies, and affect synaptic connections and synaptic plasticity in several brain regions. Yet current research mainly focuses on pyramidal neurons, while the function of NLs in interneurons remains to be understood. To explore the functional difference among NLs in the subtype-specific synapse formation of both pyramidal neurons and interneurons, we performed viral-mediated shRNA knockdown of NLs in cultured rat cortical neurons and examined the synapses in the two major types of neurons. Our results showed that in both types of neurons, NL1 and NL3 were involved in excitatory synapse formation, and NL2 in GABAergic synapse formation. Interestingly, NL1 affected GABAergic synapse formation more specifically than NL3, and NL2 affected excitatory synapse density preferentially in pyramidal neurons. In summary, our results demonstrated that different NLs play distinct roles in regulating the development and balance of excitatory and inhibitory synapses in pyramidal neurons and interneurons.

A review on the current neuroligin mouse models / 生理学报

Neuroligins (NLs) are postsynaptic membrane proteins expressed in the brain and mediate synaptogenesis. Neuroligin family proteins can specifically induce either excitatory or inhibitory synapses. Deletions or point mutations in neuroligin genes are found in patients with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) or mental retardations. The dysfunctions of these mutations have been tested in multiple neuroligin mouse models. In most of the models, including the human autism-linked NL3 and NL4 mutation mice, there are social interaction defects, memory impairment and repetitive behaviors. Researchers also found the excitatory/inhibitory synapse ratio altered in those mice, as well as receptor subunit composition. However, inconsistencies and debates also exist between different research approaches. In this review, we summarize the neuroligin mouse models currently available, examine the detailed alterations detected in those mice and compare the differences within different mouse models or different investigation methods, to obtain an overall picture of the current progress on neuroligin mouse models.