Anatomical references for tibial sagittal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of three anatomical axes based on 3D reconstructed CT images / 中华医学杂志(英文版)

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>This study was designed to analyze three tibial axis reference lines including the anterior tibial cortex (ATC) line, the fibular line (FL), and the anatomical axis of tibia (AAT) line, to determine which line most closely parallels the mechanical axis (MA) of the tibia in the sagittal plane. The clinical relevance of the study is that through finding a reliable landmark on the leg, a surgeon may minimize posterior tibial slope measurement errors thereby and improving the technique for assuring proper alignment of total knee arthroplasty.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The material for this study included CT scans of the tibia from 85 consecutive patients and 168 knees (78 without osteoarthritis (OA) and 90 knees with OA). Measurements of the angles between the tibial mechanical axis and each of three reference lines in the sagittal plane were carried out using 3D imaging software.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Mean angles of 168 knees were as follows: aMT (3.96±0.85)°, aMF (0.70±0.58)°, and aMA (1.40±0.66)°, (aMT: an angle between MA and ATC, aMF: an angle between MA and FL, aMA: an angle between MA and AAT. All abovementioned angles were measured in the sagittal plane of tibia) and the aMF was significantly smaller than the others (P < 0.0001). The mean value of the medial tibial slope angle vs. the MA was (9.19±3.97)°, and this was significantly larger than the mean lateral slope angle of (6.62±4.23)° (P < 0.0001). The difference between aMF without OA and with OA was not statistically significant (P = 0.5015) and the association between the aMT and aMA was strong (r = 0.82, P < 0.01).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>FL was more closely parallel to the MA of tibia, and more showed less variation between OA and non- OA controls than ATC and AAT lines. Furthermore, the amount of posterior slope in medial plateau was greater than that in lateral plateau. The findings of this analysis suggest that when using the anterior tibial cortex line as is commonly done with extramedullary tibial resection guides, the tibial resection should be sloped approximately four degrees more posteriorly.</p>

Cementless two-staged total hip arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic infection / 中华外科杂志

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To determine the clinical outcomes of two-staged cementless revision arthroplasty for the treatment of deep periprosthetic infection after total hip arthroplasty.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Twenty-three patients with deep periprosthetic infection treated with a standard protocol of two-staged cementless revision hip arthroplasty were enrolled in this study. There were 9 male patients and 14 female patients with an average age of 64 years (range, 52-78 years). In all cases, antibiotics-loaded cement spacers were implanted after removal of all the prosthetic components and thorough debridements had been done. All patients had a minimum of 2 weeks of intravenous antibiotics followed by 4 weeks of oral antibiotics after implant removal. After a mean interval of 6.7 months (3-28 months), revision arthroplasties were carried out with cementless femoral components followed by 2 weeks of intravenous antibiotics and 4 weeks of oral antibiotics.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The mean follow-up period was (4.3±3.5) years. There were 2 cases of recurrent infections in this study. Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures were observed in 3 patients. One patient had dislocation of the implanted spacer during the interval period and 2 patients had hip dislocation after reimplantation. Mild subsidence of femoral component occurred in 1 patient. There were no cases of loosening of femoral components and cementless acetabular components in patients without infection recurrence. The Harris hip score increased from a preoperative mean of 36±13 to 85±13 at 12 months after reimplantation.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Using cementless prostheses in two-staged revisions of hip periprosthetic infections can provide low rate of infection recurrence and good implant stability, but cautions must be taken when treating patients with infection caused by multidrug-resistant organisms.</p>