ABSTRACT
Objective@#To explore whether individualized exercise prescription can improve the walking ability of patients with lower extremity arteriosclerosis occlusion (ASO).@*Methods@#A total of 64 ASO patients with ankle brachial index (ABI) between 0.6 and 0.9 were randomly divided into the observation group (32 cases) and the control group (32 cases), Patients in the control group received routine nursing intervention, and patients in the observation group received nursing intervention based on individualized exercise prescription, ABI and walking impaired questionnaire (WIQ) scales were measured at admission and 12 weeks after intervention.@*Results@#There was no statistically significant difference in ABI values before and after the intervention of the control group (P > 0.05), and ABI values before and after the intervention of the observation group were 0.72 + 0.15 and 0.77 + 0.13 respectively (t=2.254, P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in walking distance and walking speed before intervention (P > 0.05) in the two groups; the walking distance and walking speed after intervention in the observation group were (498.38±77.11) m and (50.44±11.27); the control group was (461.72±64.64) m and (44.02±9.86), and the differences were statistically significant (t=2.06, 2.43, P < 0.05).@*Conclusions@#Individualized exercise prescription can improve the degree of ischemia of the affected limb, improve the walking distance and walking speed of the patients, and it is convenient to implement and worthy of clinical promotion.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore whether individualized exercise prescription can improve the walking ability of patients with lower extremity arteriosclerosis occlusion (ASO). Methods A total of 64 ASO patients with ankle brachial index (ABI) between 0.6 and 0.9 were randomly divided into the observation group (32 cases) and the control group (32 cases), Patients in the control group received routine nursing intervention, and patients in the observation group received nursing intervention based on individualized exercise prescription, ABI and walking impaired questionnaire (WIQ) scales were measured at admission and 12 weeks after intervention. Results There was no statistically significant difference in ABI values before and after the intervention of the control group (P>0.05), and ABI values before and after the intervention of the observation group were 0.72+0.15 and 0.77+0.13 respectively (t=2.254 , P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in walking distance and walking speed before intervention (P>0.05) in the two groups; the walking distance and walking speed after intervention in the observation group were (498.38 ± 77.11) m and (50.44 ± 11.27); the control group was (461.72 ± 64.64) m and (44.02 ± 9.86), and the differences were statistically significant (t=2.06, 2.43, P < 0.05). Conclusions Individualized exercise prescription can improve the degree of ischemia of the affected limb, improve the walking distance and walking speed of the patients, and it is convenient to implement and worthy of clinical promotion.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the effectof cognitive behavioral Intervention on the quality of life and cognitive lever of patients with venous thrombus embolism. Methods 164 patients with Venous Thrombus Embolism were randomly divided into control group and research group, the control group received routine care, The study group received cognitive behavior intervention. The cognitive lever and quality of life score was measured between before and after the intervention. Results Before the intervention, the difference score of living quality and cognitive lever in the two groups has no statistical significance (P > 0.05), and after intervention, the cognition lever and the three aspects of risk factors, anticoagulant knowledge and treatment methods of research group scored (28.47 ± 7.63), (7.38 ± 2.48), (6.82±2.73), (3.64±1.59) points which were significantly higher than the control group scored (20.54±5.49), (4.31±2.14), (3.72±1.62), (2.18±1.36) points (t=7.635, 8.469, 8.822, 6.299, P<0.01),the quality of life and four dimensions of daily life ability, pain, social activities, mental scored ( 37.04 ± 7.08), [9.00 (5.00, 11.00)],(9.04 ± 1.55),(5.52 ± 1.59),(14.00 ± 3.06) points which showed great improvement than the control group scored [49.50(39.75-59.25)], [11.50 (6.75, 16.00)], (10.05 ± 1.65), (7.95 ± 2.19), (19.18 ± 3.88) points. There were significant difference in the quality of life and four dimensions between the two groups. (Z=-3.558,-2.143, t=2.102, 4.274, 4.991, P<0.05 or 0.01). Conclusions The quality of life for the venous thrombus embolism patients were in lower level. The cognitive behavioral intervention could correcting their bad behavior and negative emotions, eventually improve the quality of life of venous thrombus embolism patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the effectof cognitive behavioral Intervention on the quality of life and cognitive lever of patients with venous thrombus embolism. Methods 164 patients with Venous Thrombus Embolism were randomly divided into control group and research group, the control group received routine care, The study group received cognitive behavior intervention. The cognitive lever and quality of life score was measured between before and after the intervention. Results Before the intervention, the difference score of living quality and cognitive lever in the two groups has no statistical significance (P > 0.05), and after intervention, the cognition lever and the three aspects of risk factors, anticoagulant knowledge and treatment methods of research group scored (28.47 ± 7.63), (7.38 ± 2.48), (6.82±2.73), (3.64±1.59) points which were significantly higher than the control group scored (20.54±5.49), (4.31±2.14), (3.72±1.62), (2.18±1.36) points (t=7.635, 8.469, 8.822, 6.299, P<0.01),the quality of life and four dimensions of daily life ability, pain, social activities, mental scored ( 37.04 ± 7.08), [9.00 (5.00, 11.00)],(9.04 ± 1.55),(5.52 ± 1.59),(14.00 ± 3.06) points which showed great improvement than the control group scored [49.50(39.75-59.25)], [11.50 (6.75, 16.00)], (10.05 ± 1.65), (7.95 ± 2.19), (19.18 ± 3.88) points. There were significant difference in the quality of life and four dimensions between the two groups. (Z=-3.558,-2.143, t=2.102, 4.274, 4.991, P<0.05 or 0.01). Conclusions The quality of life for the venous thrombus embolism patients were in lower level. The cognitive behavioral intervention could correcting their bad behavior and negative emotions, eventually improve the quality of life of venous thrombus embolism patients.