ABSTRACT
Objective To study the diagnostic value and clinical efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration ( EUS-FNA ) for mediastinal and abdominal lymphadenopathy. Methods Thirty patients who underwent EUS-FNA for mediastinal or abdominal lymphadenopathy between May 2009 and December 2015 were reviewed. The clinical efficacy of EUS-FNA was evaluated by pathological results and the follow-up. The EUS-FNA effect on clinical decision was also analyzed. Results Lesions were located in the mediastinum in 10 cases and in the abdomen in 20 cases. The total diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value ( PPV) and negative predictive value ( NPV) of EUS-FNA were 96. 7%, 94. 7%, 100. 0%, 100. 0% and 91. 7%, respectively. Of all the 30 cases, 20 lymph glands were of unknown origin. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of EUS-FNA in these lesions were 95. 0%, 88. 9%, 100. 0%, 100. 0% and 91. 7%, respectively. The combination of cytological and histological examination had higher accuracy ( 96. 7% VS 73. 3%, P=0. 026) and sensitivity ( 94. 7%VS 57. 8%, P= 0. 019 ) than cytological examination only. Immunohistochemistry stains were performed in 12 neoplastic cases, and 11 ( 91. 7%) were confirmed. The diagnosis by EUS-FNA had positive impact on clinical decisions in 27 patients ( 90. 0%) . Conclusion EUS-FNA is an effective approach for mediastinal and abdominal lymphadenopathy, and the result has a positive impact on clinical decisions. The combination of cytological and histological examination and application of ancillary techniques, such as immunohistochemistry stains, can improve the diagnostic efficacy of EUS-FNA.
ABSTRACT
Objective To study the diagnostic value and clinical efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration ( EUS-FNA ) for mediastinal and abdominal lymphadenopathy. Methods Thirty patients who underwent EUS-FNA for mediastinal or abdominal lymphadenopathy between May 2009 and December 2015 were reviewed. The clinical efficacy of EUS-FNA was evaluated by pathological results and the follow-up. The EUS-FNA effect on clinical decision was also analyzed. Results Lesions were located in the mediastinum in 10 cases and in the abdomen in 20 cases. The total diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value ( PPV) and negative predictive value ( NPV) of EUS-FNA were 96. 7%, 94. 7%, 100. 0%, 100. 0% and 91. 7%, respectively. Of all the 30 cases, 20 lymph glands were of unknown origin. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of EUS-FNA in these lesions were 95. 0%, 88. 9%, 100. 0%, 100. 0% and 91. 7%, respectively. The combination of cytological and histological examination had higher accuracy ( 96. 7% VS 73. 3%, P=0. 026) and sensitivity ( 94. 7%VS 57. 8%, P= 0. 019 ) than cytological examination only. Immunohistochemistry stains were performed in 12 neoplastic cases, and 11 ( 91. 7%) were confirmed. The diagnosis by EUS-FNA had positive impact on clinical decisions in 27 patients ( 90. 0%) . Conclusion EUS-FNA is an effective approach for mediastinal and abdominal lymphadenopathy, and the result has a positive impact on clinical decisions. The combination of cytological and histological examination and application of ancillary techniques, such as immunohistochemistry stains, can improve the diagnostic efficacy of EUS-FNA.