ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To evaluate and compare the efficiency and safety of laparoscopic surgery (LS) and open surgery (OS) in the treatment of colorectal carcinoma.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Randomized controlled trials on laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for colorectal carcinoma from January 2000 to October 2010 were searched in the databases of EMbase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Sciencedirect, Springer, VIP, CNKI, CBMdisc. The methodological quality was assessed according to the standard of Cochrane systematic review. For homogeneous studies, RevMan5.0 software was used for meta-analysis.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>A total of 13 RCTs involving 4603 patients were included in this study, and among those 6 were multi-center randomized controlled trials. The meta-analysis showed that: the operation time of the LS group was longer than that of the OS group (WMD = 38.91, 95%CI: 33.89 - 43.93, P < 0.001), the blood loss (WMD = -138.14, 95%CI: -195.79 - -80.50, P < 0.001) and the length of hospital stay (WMD = 2.91, 95%CI: -4.65 - -1.17, P = 0.001) of the LS group was less than those in OS group. There was no significant differences between the two groups in the number of dissected lymph nodes (WMD = -0.62, 95%CI: -1.47 - 0.23, P = 0.150). There was no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the postoperative complications (30 days) (RR = 0.78, 95%CI: 0.59 - 1.01, P = 0.06). There was no significant differences between the two groups in 3-year overall survival (RR = 1.00, 95%CI: 0.96 - 1.04, P = 0.970). There was no significant differences between the two groups in 5-year overall survival (RR = 1.03, 95%CI: 0.99 - 1.08, P = 0.140). There was no significant differences between the two groups in 5-year overall recurrence (RR = 0.89, 95%CI: 0.74 - 1.07, P = 0.200).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal carcinoma is a safe and effective therapy as open surgery in the short term or long term outcomes. It could be an acceptable alternative to open surgery for colorectal carcinoma.</p>
Subject(s)
Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms , General Surgery , Laparoscopy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVES</b>To investigate the effect of short interfering RNA targeting MAT 2A on growth and apoptosis of hepatoma cells.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The four siRNA against MAT 2A gene were transcript synthesized intracelluarly by expressed templates of plasmid vector pSilence-2.1-U6. We inserted the target sequence of MAT 2A gene into the upstream of the reporter gene in order to construct the recombinant plasmid vector plucA-MAT 2A. The recombinant plasmid and siRNA-producing plasmid were co-transfected into 293 T cells using this construct via lipofectamine methods. The inhibition effect was detected by measuring luciferase activity in the cell lysate to screen the effective siRNA, and then, the effective siRNA was transfected into Bel-7402 cells. The effect of siRNA treatment on the MAT 2A mRNA level and the MAT activity of hepatoma cells were measured. In order to study the effect of short interfering RNA targeting MAT 2A on growth and apoptosis of hepatoma cells, the tumor cell killing rate was analyzed by MTT method and the rate of apoptosis of hepatoma cells was evaluated by flow cytometry.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The two siRNA among the four siRNA displayed inhibitory effect on the lucifermase expression with the inhibitory rates of 81% and 89% respectively. The expression of MAT 2A mRNA in Bel-7402 cells was specifically inhibited and the MAT activity in Bel-7402 cells was decreased. Furthermore, silencing of the MAT 2A gene by RNAi significantly inhibited hepatoma cell growth and led to induction of apoptosis.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>RNA interference-mediated silencing of MAT 2A gene attenuates growth and induces apoptosis of hepatoma cells; MAT 2A is an ideal target of gene-specific therapy for liver cancer.</p>