Can surface protection prevent the loss of hardness on dentin and composite resin surfaces exposed to erosive challenges? / ¿Puede la protección de la superficie prevenir la pérdida de dureza en las superficies de dentina y resina compuesta expuestas a erosión?

Objective: This study investigated the effect of endogenous erosion on the microhardness of dentine and a nanofilled composite resin. Procedures for preventing erosion were also studied. Materials and Methods: 90 bovine dentine specimens were divided into three groups in accordance with the method for preventing: negative control, topical application of fluoride and resin-modified glass ionomer varnish. 120 composite resin specimens were distributed into four groups, which also included a resin sealant, among the preventive procedures. Specimens were then randomly divided into three sub-groups according to the exposure to simulate gastric acid solution and subsequent remineralization: negative control, 9 and 18 cycles. Surface analysis was carried out by measuring the Knoop hardness. The data obtained were statistically analyzed using 2-way ANOVA and Tukey test. Result: The mean hardness of dentine and of the composite specimens resin exhibited lower hardness after 18 cycles. However, the resin-modified glass ionomer varnish resulted in greater values compared to the other preventive procedures. Conclusion: A resin-modified glass ionomer varnish seems to be a promising method for minimizing the damage caused by endogenous acid, but its protection can be reduced depending on the intensity of the erosive challenge.

Objetivo: Este estudio investigó el efecto de la erosión endógena sobre la microdureza de la dentina y una resina compuesta de nanorrelleno. También se estudiaron los procedimientos para prevenir la erosión. Materiales and Métodos:90 muestras de dentina bovina se dividieron en tres grupos de acuerdo con el método para prevenir: control negativo, aplicación tópica de fluoruro y barniz de ionómero de vidrio modificado con resina. Se distribuyeron 120 muestras de resina compuesta en cuatro grupos, que también incluían un sellador de resina, entre los procedimientos preventivos. Las muestras se dividieron al azar en tres subgrupos de acuerdo con la exposición para simular la solución de ácido gástrico y la remineralización posterior: control negativo, 9 y 18 ciclos. El análisis de la superficie se realizó midiendo la dureza Knoop. Los datos obtenidos se analizaron estadísticamente mediante ANOVA de 2 vías y prueba de Tukey. Resultados: La dureza media de la dentina y de la resina de muestras compuestas exhibió una dureza más baja después de 18 ciclos. Sin embargo, el barniz de ionómero de vidrio modificado con resina resultó en valores mayores en comparación con los otros procedimientos preventivos. Conclusión: Un barniz de ionómero de vidrio modificado con resina parece ser un método prometedor para minimizar el daño causado por el ácido endógeno, pero su protección puede reducirse dependiendo de la intensidad del desafío erosivo.

Effect of the ceramic translucency on the long-term water sorption and solubility of resin cements

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the translucency of ceramic on water sorption and solubility of resin cements over time. Methods: Lithium disilicate ceramic slides (15x15x1 mm), A1 in color and with different translucencies (high-medium-low) were manufactured; and a glass slide with similar dimension was used as control. Under every slide, 15 specimens (8x0.5 mm) from each resin cement were prepared: light-cured (RelyX Veneer); conventional dual-cured (RelyX ARC); and self-adhesive dual-cured (Rely-X U200). The specimens were then sub-divided according to the period of evaluation (immediately, after 6 and 12 months of storage) (n=5). To evaluate the loss or gain of mass, the specimens were dried until a constant mass was reached. Subsequently, they were divided according to the respective period of storage at 37°C in distilled water and weighed immediately following removal from water. After each period, specimens underwent a new dehydration. Values from water sorption and solubility were calculated and statistically analyzed (Anova 3-way/Tukey test). Results: The lower translucency resulted in greater water sorption and solubility for all cements, regardless of the experimental period. The self-adhesive dual-cured cement showed higher water sorption under all experimental periods and had worse values after 1 year aging. Differences among solubility could only be detected after aging, and the light-cured material had higher values after 6 and 12 months. Conclusions: It could be concluded that the low degree of translucency can negatively influence the passage of light and interfere on the durability of the resin cement. The conventional dual-cured resinous agent seemed to be less affected by such condition

Análise da influência do posicionamento do fotopolimerizador sobre a rugosidade superficial da resina composta ­ estudo in vitro / Analysis of the influence of the photopolymerizer on the surface roughness of the composite resin ­ in vitro study

Introdução: uma adequada polimerização da resina composta proporciona um bom desempenho clínico e propriedades físicas satisfatórias na restauração. A conversão de monômeros em polímeros depende não só da luz visível emitida pelo fotopolimerizador e do sistema fotoiniciador presente na resina composta, como também da quantidade de energia que alcança a resina composta e que está na dependência de como essa luz é aplicada sobre a resina. Objetivo: verificar a influência do posicionamento da ponta de um fotopolimerizador de amplo espectro sobre a rugosidade de duas resinas compostas. Metodologia: previamente à confecção dos corpos de prova, foi realizada a randomização de quatro grupos experimentais (n=10) para locação dos corpos de prova, da resina Vittra APS (FGM) em duas apresentações (Vittra APS Esmalte-bleach e a Vittra APS Dentina A0) e duas variações do posicionamento da ponta do fotopolimerizador (0º e 20º). Foram confeccionados quarenta corpos de prova cilíndricos em resina composta, na dimensão 6 x 1,5 mm. Valores da Ra foram registrados usando-se um rugosímetro e analisados estatisticamente (Shapiro-Wilk/ ANOVA). A rugosidade superficial (Ra) de topo de cada corpo de prova foi individualmente avaliada, sendo realizadas três leituras por superfície em posições diferentes. Resultados: não foi verificada significância estatística da interação entre os fatores, nem foram notadas diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre os fatores isolados. Dentre os posicionamentos analisados, constatou-se que o fotopolimerizador a 20º não alterou a rugosidade das resinas utilizadas. Conclusão: a variação da angulação da ponta do fotopolimerizador em 20o não alterou a rugosidade superficial das resinas testadas.

Introduction: proper polymerization of the composite resin provides good clinical performance and satisfactory physical properties of the restoration. The conversion of monomers to polymers depends not only on the visible light emitted by the curing light and the photoinitiating system present in the composite resin, but also on the amount of energy that the composite resin reaches and is dependent on how that light is applied to the resin. Objective: to verify the influence of the tip positioning of a broad spectrum curing light on the roughness of two composite resins. Metodology: prior to the preparation of the specimens, four experimental groups (n = 10) were randomized to locate the specimens, Vittra APS resin (FGM) in two presentations (Vittra APS Enamel-bleach and Vittra APS Dentin A0) and two variations of the curing tip positioning (0º and 20º). Forty 6 x 1.5 mm composite resin cylindrical specimens were made. Ra values were recorded using a roughness meter and statistically analyzed (Shapiro-Wilk/ANOVA). The top surface roughness (Ra) of each specimen was individually evaluated and three surface readings were taken at different positions. Results: no statistical significance of the interaction between the factors was verified, nor were statistically significant differences observed between the isolated factors. Among the positions analyzed, it was found that the curing light at 20º did not change the roughness of the resins used. Conclusion: variation of the curing angle of the curing light tip at 20o did not change the surface roughness of the resins tested.