Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 2022 Oct; 70(10): 3550-3555
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-224612

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To compare the retinal sensitivities between the blue?on?yellow perimetry (BYP)/short?wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) and green?on?yellow perimetry (GYP) among patients with and without nuclear sclerosis among glaucoma suspects. Methods: After ophthalmic examination, patients were subjected to two perimetric tests: BYP and GYP. The visual field (VF) parameters were compared between the two perimeters (p < 0.05 was considered significant). Results: Fifty?five eyes of 39 patients with a mean age of 60.53 ± 9.70 years were included in the study. Twenty?one eyes had clear lens or pseudophakia. Twenty?six eyes had lower grades of nuclear sclerosis (NO2NC2, NO3NC3) and eight eyes had higher grades of cataract (NO4NC4, NO5NC5). The mean retinal sensitivity (RS) in BYP was 22.08 ± 5.02 (dB) and in GYP was 23.84 ± 5.50 (dB) (p = 0.08). The mean defect in BYP was ?2.56 ± 4.40 (dB) and in GYP was ?3.24 ± 5.05 (dB), pattern standard deviation (PSD) in BYP was 3.65 ± 1.91 (dB) and in GYP was 3.83 ± 1.99 (dB), and foveal threshold (FT) was 24.20 ± 4.32 (dB) in BYP and 28.10 ± 4.50 (dB) in GYP. The two perimeters showed good agreement by the Bland–Altman plot for all parameters. Fourteen eyes showed perimetric changes suggestive of glaucoma by BYP. In these, GYP had a sensitivity of 92.86% (95% CI of 66.13% to 99.82%) and specificity of 95.12% (95% CI of 83.47% to 99.40%). Conclusion: BYP and GYP show good agreement. They are comparable in clear media as well as in different grades of nuclear sclerosis. GYP showed good sensitivity and specificity compared to BYP.

2.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 2016 Feb; 64(2): 160-162
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-179145

ABSTRACT

Peribulbar block, though safe, can cause serious complications such as globe perforation and peribulbar hemorrhage. Hyaluronidase is an enzyme that is used as an adjuvant in peribulbar anesthesia, and it helps in rapid penetration of the anesthetic agent. Hypersensitivity to hyaluronidase is a rare but potentially sight‑threatening complication. We report a case of hyaluronidase hypersensitivity following peribulbar injection for cataract surgery mimicking as peribulbar hematoma in the immediate postinjection phase and as orbital cellulitis 48 h later.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL