Carotid Artery Stump Pressure and Associated Neurological Changes in Predominantly Symptomatic Carotid Artery Disease Patients Undergoing Awake Carotid Endarterectomy : Cardiovascular Topics

Aim : To determine the mean carotid artery stump pressure (SP) at which patients develop neurological changes while undergoing awake carotid artery endarterectomy (CEA) under cervical block anaesthesia (CBA). Methods : A prospective analysis was carried out of patients undergoing awake CEA under CBA between February 2004 and April 2007. All patients had mean SP measured; with selective shunting on those who developed neurological symptoms on carotid artery clamping regardless of stump pressure. A ball connected to a pressure sensor was put in the patient's contra-lateral hand. Results : Fifty-nine patients had awake CEA; 40 were males with a mean age of 64 years. Indications for CEA were asymptomatic high-grade stenosis in 12 (20) patients and symptomatic stenosis in 47 (80). Seven (12) patients required shunting; one for transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and six for loss of consciousness. Six of these patients had presented with symptomatic disease. Taking the threshold of mean carotid SP of 50 mmHg as an indication for shunting; 22(6 / 27) of patients with a mean SP of 50 mmHg required shunting and only 3(1 / 32) with a mean carotid SP of 50 mmHg needed a shunt. This was not statistically significant. Using a mean carotid SP of ? 40 mmHg as the threshold for shunting; 40(4 / 10) of patients required shunting and 3(1 / 31) with a mean carotid SP of 40 mmHg required shunting. This was statistically significant. Thirteen (22) patients were complicated by transient hoarseness of voice. One (2) had a haematoma that required re-exploration. None of these patients had any major postoperative neurological or cardiological complications. Conclusion : Even though the sample in this study was small; awake CEA under local anaesthesia was seen as a safe procedure. It would appear to be safe to use the mean SP of 40 mmHg as a threshold for selective shunting in CEA under general anaesthesia

Carotid Intervention : Stent or Surgery? A Prospective Audit : Cardiovascular Topic

This study represents a prospective audit comparing carotid artery stenting (CAS) with carotid endarterectomy (CEA); performed by a single surgical team. Between January 2005 and December 2008; 440 patients were referred; 177 had CAS and 263 CEA. Selection of procedure was individualised and contra-indications for CAS included internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis 85-90; intraluminal thrombus; ICA tortuosity; gross surface ulceration of plaque and excessive calcification. Type III aortic arch and arch calcification also precluded CAS. Standard techniques were used for both procedures with a protection device routinely used for CAS. Most CEAs were performed under general anaesthesia; with selective intraluminal shunting. One hundred and eighty-six patients were selected for CAS; nine (48) were converted to CEA for technical reasons. The operative risk profile was similar; but significantly more in the CAS group were hypertensive. Almost half (49) in the CAS group were asymptomatic vs 26in the CEA group. All asymptomatics had 70+stenosis on Duplex Doppler. Results were reported within one month of the procedure. The stroke rate was 2.3for CAS vs 1.9for CEA (p 0.05). Stroke and death plus one M1 was 4.5after CAS vs 3.4after CEA (p 0.05). Disabling stroke occurred in 1.1of CAS patients vs 0.4of CEA patients. These results are satisfactory and compare favourably with other similar series