Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
SJA-Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia. 2014; 8 (3): 368-373
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-152553

ABSTRACT

Post-operative pain frequently hampers implementation of day care arthroscopic knee surgery in spite of so many analgesic, local anesthetic drugs and routes of administration. The aim of the present study was carried out to compare the efficacy of ropivacaine and levobupivacaine when administered through intra-articular route in controlling pain after day care arthroscopic knee surgery. It was a prospective, double-blinded and randomized controlled study. April 2008-December 2008, 60 patients of both sex, of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II, undergoing day care arthroscopic knee surgery were randomly assigned into two groups [R, L]. Group R received 10 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine, whereas group L received 10 ml of 0.50% levobupivacaine through intra-articular route at the end of the procedure. Pain assessed using visual analog scale [VAS] and diclofenac sodium given as rescue analgesia when VAS >3. Time of first analgesic request and total rescue analgesic were calculated. Based on comparable demographic profiles; time for the requirement of first post-operative rescue analgesia [242.16 +/- 23.86 vs. 366.62 +/- 24.42] min and total mean rescue analgesic requirement was [104.35 +/- 18.96 vs. 76.82 +/- 14.28] mg in group R and L respectively. Group R had higher mean VAS score throughout the study period. No side effects found among the groups. These two results were clinically and statistically significant [P < 0.05]. Hence, it was evident that intra-articular levobupivacaine give better post-operative pain relief, with an increase in time of first analgesic request and decreased need of total post-operative analgesia compared with ropivacaine

2.
SJA-Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia. 2014; 8 (2): 233-237
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-142206

ABSTRACT

Postoperative pain is very common distressing symptom after any surgical procedure. Different drugs in different routes have been used for controlling post-arthroscopic pain. No one proved to be ideal. We have compared the analgesic effect of ropivacaine, fentanyl, and dexmedetomidine when administered through the intra-articular route in arthroscopic knee surgery. From March 2008 to July 2010, 99 patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery were randomly assigned into three groups [A,B,C] in a prospective double-blinded fashion. Group A received 10 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine, where Group B received 50 microg fentanyl, and Group C received 100 microg of dexmedetomidine through the intra-articular route at the end of procedure. Pain assessed using visual analog scale and diclofenac sodium given as rescue analgesia when VAS >4. Time of first analgesia request and total rescue analgesic used in 24 hours were calculated. Demographic profiles are quite comparable among the groups. Time for requirement of first postoperative rescue analgesia in Group A was 380.61 +/- 22.973 min, in Group B was 326.82 +/- 17.131 min and in Group C was 244.09 +/- 20.096 minutes. Total rescue analgesia requirement was less in Group A [1.394 +/- 0.496] compared to Group B [1.758 +/- 0.435] and Group C [2.546 +/- 0.546]. Group A had higher mean VAS score at 6th and 24th postoperative hours. No side effects found among the groups. Therefore, it suggests that intra-articular ropivacaine gives better postoperative pain relief, with increased time of first analgesic request and decreased need of total postoperative analgesia compared to fentanyl and dexmedetomidine.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Arthroscopy , Amides , Injections, Intra-Articular , Fentanyl , Dexmedetomidine , Prospective Studies , Double-Blind Method , Knee
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL