Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-215076

ABSTRACT

Development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to different generations of common antibiotics by various organisms is rising alarmingly. A nationwide standard antibiotic policy is needed. We wanted to study the resistant organisms, the drug class to which organisms are becoming resistant and identify factors favoring the development of AMR for formulating an effective antibiotic policy. MethodsWe conducted this observational study from January 2018 to May 2019 in a tertiary care hospital in India. Sample (urine, blood from ICU patients) processing, organism identification and antibiotic susceptibility tests were carried out as per the institutional guidelines in the Microbiology Department from where data collection was done. ResultsOut of 500 samples, 145 (29%) showed significant growth of organisms exhibiting resistance to either single or multiple drugs. Acinetobacter spp. was the most common organism isolated with a total of 40 (27.58%), followed by Klebsiella spp. 23 (15.83%), MRSA 20 (13.79%), E. coli 15 (10.34%), Pseudomonas 12 (8.27%), Enterococci 12 (8.27%), and CoNS 7 (4.82%). Among GNB, Klebsiella and E. coli showed minimal resistance to polymyxins, fosfomycin, minocycline and tigecycline. Among Staphylococcus spp. maximum sensitivity was seen to teicoplanin, tobramycin, tigecycline and minocycline. Acinetobacter spp. showed high sensitivity to polymyxins, tobramycin, tetracycline, tigecycline and minocycline. ConclusionsAMR was highly prevalent with hospital acquired organisms, and against commonly used antibiotics. Variation of resistance and sensitivity pattern with time and local microflora necessitates periodic AMR monitoring and rotation of antibiotics is suggested to restrict further emergence of resistance. Focusing on the organisms causing UTI and BSI and their resistance pattern, helps in selecting proper antibiotic therapy and in strengthening general sepsis measures.

2.
Indian Pediatr ; 2014 June; 51(6): 505
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-170666
3.
Braz. j. microbiol ; 35(4): 316-323, Oct.-Dec. 2004. ilus, tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-402616

ABSTRACT

Diclofenac sódico, um agente antiinflamatório, mostrou ação inibitória marcante contra isolados clínicos de Mycobacterium tuberculosis sensíveis e resistentes à drogas, bem como contra outras micobactérias. A droga foi testada in vitro contra 45 cepas diferentes de micobactérias, sendo que a maioria foi inibida pela droga na concentração de 10-25 µg/ml. Quando testado in vitro, diclofenac injetado em ratos albinos da linhagem Swiss, na proporção de 10 µg/g de peso corporal, provocou proteção significativa dos animais desafiados com metade da dose letal de M. tuberculosis H37 Rv 102. De acordo com o teste c2, os dados in vivo foram altamente significativos (p < 0,01). Diclofenac foi posteriormente testado quanto ao sinergismo com a droga antimicobacteriana convencional estreptomicina, frente a M. smegmatis 798. Quando comparado aos seus efeitos individuais, o sinergismo foi estatisticamente significativo (p < 0,05). Através da análise checkerboard, o índice fracional de concentração inibitória para essa combinação foi 0,37, confirmando o sinergismo.


Subject(s)
Diclofenac , Drug Synergism , In Vitro Techniques , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Streptomycin , Methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL