ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the curative effects of extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair and tradi-tional hernia repair in the treatment of inguinal hernia.Methods The clinical data of 200 inguinal hernia patients in our hospital from October 2013 to Novermber 2015 were retrospectively analyzed.They were divided into traditional hernia repair group (100 cases)and laparoscopic hernia repair group (100 cases)according to different surgical treatment.The operation time,bed activity time and hospital stay of the two groups were detected.The uroschesis, hydrocele,incidence of postoperative pain and recurrence rate of the two groups were detected.Results The opera-tion time between the two groups had no significant difference(t =1.74,P >0.05).The bed activity time[(2.6 ± 1.6)h]and hospital stay[(5.7 ±2.1 )d]of the laparoscopic hernia repair group were better than the traditional hernia repair group[(9.1 ±3.3)h,(7.4 ±2.3)d,t =17.72,5.46,all P <0.05].The uroschesis 3.0%,hydrocele 0,incidence of postoperative pain 10.0% and recurrence rate 0 of the laparoscopic hernia repair group were lower than the traditional hernia repair group(21.0%,15.0%,50.0%,12.0%,χ2 =15.17,15.34,39.11,11.69,all P <0.05).Conclusion The recovery is fast in inguinal hernia patients treatment by extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair,complication is little,which is worthy of application.