ABSTRACT
To observe therapeutic effect of early use of nicorandil on patients with myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and its influence on cardiac function .Methods : A total of 124 MI patients undergoing PCI in our hospital from 2016 to 2018 were randomly and equally divided into PCI group and nicorandil + PCI group (received nicorandil based on PCI group ) , both groups were treated for 28d. Therapeutic effect , incidence of adverse , LVEF , LVEDd and cardiac index (CI) before and three months after PCI were recorded and compared between two groups .Results : Compared with PCI group , there was significant rise in total effective rate (72.6% vs .90.3%) , and significant reductions in incidence rates of recurrent angina pectoris (25.8% vs.11.3%) and malignant arrhythmia (22.6% vs.8.1%) in nicorandil + PCI group , P＜0. 05 all.Compared with before PCI , there were significant rise in LVEF and CI , and significant reduction in LVEDd in two groups on three months after PCI ;compared with PCI group , there were significant rise in LVEF [ (40.52 ± 4.38)% vs.(46.81 ± 4.53)%] and CI [ (2.43 ± 0.35) L·min－1 ·m－2 vs.(2.66 ± 0.38) L·min－1 ·m－2 ] , and significant reduction in LVEDd [ (54. 32 ± 6.23) mm vs.(48. 24 ± 5.34) mm] in nicorandil + PCI group on three months after PCI , P＝0.001 all.There was no significant difference in incidence rate of adverse drug reactions dur‐ing treatment between two groups , P＝0.753. Conclusion : Early use of nicorandil can significantly improve thera‐peutic effect , contribute to recovery of cardiac function with good safety in MI patients undergoing PCI , which is worth extending .
ABSTRACT
To explore therapeutic effect of irbesartan combined metoprolol on patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) complicated atrial or ventricular arrhythmia .Methods : A total of 168 CHF patients with atrial or ventricular arrhythmia treated in our hospital from 2017 were randomly and equally divided into metoprolol group (re‐ceived metoprolol based on routine treatment ) and combined treatment group (received irbesartan based on metoprolol group) , both groups were treated for three months .LVEF , left ventricular posterior wall thickness (LVPWT) , interven‐tricular septal thickness (IVST) before and after treatment , therapeutic effect were observed and compared between two groups.Results : Total effective rate of combined treatment group was significantly higher than that of metoprolol group (90.5% vs.73.8%) , P＝ 0.005. Compared with before treatment , there was significant rise in LVEF [ (55.16 ± 6.52)% vs.(64.24 ± 8.72)%] , and significant reductions in LVPWT [ (14.72 ± 1.78) mm vs.(13.27 ± 1.14) mm] , IVST [ (10.18 ± 1.15) mm vs.(9.12 ± 0.64) mm] in combined treatment group after treatment , P＝0.001 all ;and compared with metoprolol group after three‐month treatment , there was significant rise in LVEF [ (56.13 ± 6.15)%vs.(64. 24 ± 8.72)%] , and significant reductions in LVPWT [ (14. 35 ± 1. 23) mm vs.(13.27 ± 1.14) mm] and IVST [(9. 88 ± 0.85) mm vs.(9. 12 ± 0. 64) mm] in combined treatment group , P＝0. 001 all.There was no signif‐icant difference in incidence rate of adverse between two groups , P＝ 0.799. Conclusion : Irbesartan combined metoprolol possess significant therapeutic effect on patients with CHF complicated atrial or ventricular arrhythmia with good safety .Inhibition on ventricular remodeling may be its main mechanism .
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses regarding acupuncture intervention for stroke and the primary studies within them.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Two researchers searched PubMed, Cumulative index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, ISI Web of Knowledge, Cochrane, Allied and Complementary Medicine, Ovid Medline, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang and Traditional Chinese Medical Database to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses about acupuncture for stroke published from the inception to December 2016. Review characteristics and the criteria for assessing the primary studies within reviews were extracted. The methodological quality of the reviews was assessed using adapted Oxman and Guyatt Scale. The methodological quality of primary studies was also assessed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Thirty-two eligible reviews were identified, 15 in English and 17 in Chinese. The English reviews were scored higher than the Chinese reviews (P=0.025), especially in criteria for avoiding bias and the scope of search. All reviews used the quality criteria to evaluate the methodological quality of primary studies, but some criteria were not comprehensive. The primary studies, in particular the Chinese reviews, had problems with randomization, allocation concealment, blinding, dropouts and withdrawals, intent-to-treat analysis and adverse events.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Important methodological flaws were found in Chinese systematic reviews and primary studies. It was necessary to improve the methodological quality and reporting quality of both the systematic reviews published in China and primary studies on acupuncture for stroke.</p>