Assessment of noninvasive risk markers of subclinical atherosclerosis in premenopausal women with previous history of gestational diabetes mellitus

Gestational diabetes mellitus [GDM] is state of carbohydrate intolerance detected first time during pregnancy. GDM represents a significant risk factor for the development of CVD in women. The degree to which women with histories of gestational diabetes are at risk for cardiovascular disease, beyond their predisposition to future diabetes, is still unclear. The aim of our study was to assess the presence of surrogate markers of subclinical atherosclerosis which can be present in them even without developing type 2 diabetes. In this descriptive cross-sectional hospital based study, 50 patients 20-45 yrs of age, premenopausal, at least 1 yr past her most recent pregnancy, and not more than 5 yr past her index pregnancy with GDM. These patients and controls who did not have GDM were assessed for carotid intima media thickness,endothelial dysfunction, epicardial fat thickness and other cardiovascular risk factors. Women with pGDM were found to have unfavourable cardiovascular risk parameters. They also demonstrated more frequent occurrence of metabolic syndrome [64% vs 10%] than control subjects. Individual components of MS increased with increasing BMI in both the groups. As far as markers of subclinical atherosclerosis were concerned women with pGDM had significantly higher CIMT, FMD and epicardial fat thickness than control group. Women with pGDM, even before development of diabetes have significant differences in CVD risk factors when compared to those who do not have such history. Postpartum screening for glucose intolerance and efforts to minimize modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, including hypertension, viscerall adiposity, and dyslipidemia should be the most effective measures for lowering of cardiovascular risk

Chyluria: a mimicker of nephrotic syndrome

Chyluria can be confused with nephrotic syndrome when massive proteinuria is present on urine examination during evaluation of a milky/white urine. Our objective was to attempt to resolve diagnosis in the case of nephrotic range proteinuria when there is no clear evidence of a significant kidney lesion. Retrospective review of the medical records of all patients referred the nephrology department at a single institution. We identified a subgroup of patients misdiagnosed with nephrotic syndrome and treated aggressively with immunosupression with no benefit and who were later diagnosed as having chyluria. Twelve patients were identified [8 men, 4 women] with a median age of 34.5 years. Chyle was positive in the urine in eight while chyle was positive on oral ingestion of butterfat in another 4. Six had undergone kidney biopsy and were treated as having minimal change disease. Eight had massive proteinuria and a history of treatment with prednisone, but none of these patients had shown improvement in their clinical presentation. Two patients showed excellent results with diethylcarbamazine with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in while eight required betadine instillation in the fistulous connection with success in six. Surgical correction was successfully tried in two of these resistant cases. In individuals with nephrotic range proteinuria with a normal or low lipid profile status along with normal serum albumin levels, urine color and nature, frequency, and checking the urine for chyle can help identify the large subgroup who unnecessarily have to undergo kidney biopsy and at times are treated with immunosuppression, which is not only life threatening but useless in these patients.