ABSTRACT
Objective@#Moyamoya disease (MMD) is a vasculopathy of the internal carotid arteries with ischemic and hemorrhagic sequelae. Surgical revascularization confers upfront peri-procedural risk and costs in exchange for long-term protective benefit against hemorrhagic disease. The authors present a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of surgical versus non-surgical management of MMD. @*Methods@#A Markov Model was used to simulate a 41-year-old suffering a transient ischemic attack (TIA) secondary to MMD and now faced with operative versus nonoperative treatment options. Health utilities, costs, and outcome probabilities were obtained from the CEA registry and the published literature. The primary outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness ratio which compared the quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs of surgical and nonsurgical treatments. Base-case, one-way sensitivity, two-way sensitivity, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed with a willingness to pay threshold of $50,000. @*Results@#The base case model yielded 3.81 QALYs with a cost of $99,500 for surgery, and 3.76 QALYs with a cost of $106,500 for nonsurgical management. One-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated the greatest sensitivity in assumptions to cost of surgery and cost of admission for hemorrhagic stroke, and probabilities of stroke with no surgery, stroke after surgery, poor surgical outcome, and death after surgery. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses demonstrated that surgical revascularization was the cost-effective strategy in over 87.4% of simulations. @*Conclusions@#Considering both direct and indirect costs and the postoperative QALY, surgery is considerably more cost-effective than non-surgical management for adults with MMD.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#Moyamoya disease (MMD) is a vasculopathy of the internal carotid arteries with ischemic and hemorrhagic sequelae. Surgical revascularization confers upfront peri-procedural risk and costs in exchange for long-term protective benefit against hemorrhagic disease. The authors present a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of surgical versus non-surgical management of MMD. @*Methods@#A Markov Model was used to simulate a 41-year-old suffering a transient ischemic attack (TIA) secondary to MMD and now faced with operative versus nonoperative treatment options. Health utilities, costs, and outcome probabilities were obtained from the CEA registry and the published literature. The primary outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness ratio which compared the quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs of surgical and nonsurgical treatments. Base-case, one-way sensitivity, two-way sensitivity, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed with a willingness to pay threshold of $50,000. @*Results@#The base case model yielded 3.81 QALYs with a cost of $99,500 for surgery, and 3.76 QALYs with a cost of $106,500 for nonsurgical management. One-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated the greatest sensitivity in assumptions to cost of surgery and cost of admission for hemorrhagic stroke, and probabilities of stroke with no surgery, stroke after surgery, poor surgical outcome, and death after surgery. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses demonstrated that surgical revascularization was the cost-effective strategy in over 87.4% of simulations. @*Conclusions@#Considering both direct and indirect costs and the postoperative QALY, surgery is considerably more cost-effective than non-surgical management for adults with MMD.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#Although stroke guidelines recommend antiplatelets be started 24 hoursafter tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), select mechanical thrombectomy (MT)patients with luminal irregularities or underlying intracranial atherosclerotic diseasemay benefit from earlier antiplatelet administration. @*Methods@#We explore the safety of early (< 24 hours) post-tPA antiplatelet use byretrospectively reviewing patients who underwent MT and stent placement for acuteischemic stroke from June 2015 to April 2018 at our institution. @*Results@#Six patients met inclusion criteria. Median presenting and pre-operativeNational Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores were 14 (Interquartile Range [IQR]5.5-17.3) and 16 (IQR 13.7-18.7), respectively. Five patients received standard intravenous(IV) tPA and one patient received intra-arterial tPA. Median time from symptomonset to IV tPA was 120 min (IQR 78-204 min). Median time between tPA and antiplateletadministration was 4.9 hours (IQR 3.0-6.7 hours). Clots were successfullyremoved from the internal carotid artery (ICA) or middle cerebral artery (MCA) in 5patients, the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) in one patient, and the vertebrobasilarjunction in one patient. All patients underwent MT before stenting and achievedthrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2B recanalization. Stents were placed in the ICA(n=4), common carotid artery (n=1), and basilar artery (n=1). The median time fromstroke onset to endovascular access was 185 min (IQR 136-417 min). No patientsexperienced symptomatic post-procedure intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Medianmodified Rankin Scale score on discharge was 3.5. @*Conclusions@#Antiplatelets within 24 hours of tPA did not result in symptomatic ICHin this series. The safety and efficacy of early antiplatelet administration after tPA inselect patients following mechanical thrombectomy warrants further study.