ABSTRACT
ResumoIntrodução:O micofenolato mofetil (MMF), pró-droga do ácido micofenólico (MPA), é um tratamento imunossupressor eficaz na profilaxia da rejeição aguda, mas associado a eventos adversos gastrointestinais. O micofenolato sódico (MPS) com revestimento entérico foi desenvolvido com a intenção de reduzir tais eventos associados ao MPA.Objetivo:Avaliar a tolerabilidade de EC-MPS e MMF em receptores de transplante renal.Métodos:Estudo retrospectivo, multicêntrico, com pacientes submetidos a transplante renal entre 07/01/2004 e 31/07/2007 em 18 centros brasileiros.Resultados:1380 pacientes incluídos, 702 receberam EC-MPS e 678 receberam MMF. A idade média de 42,3 anos, 60% masculino e 62,5% de etnia caucasiana. A incidência de eventos avaliados no desfecho composto de eficácia não foi diferente entre os grupos ao final de 24 meses de acompanhamento (22,9% para EC-MPS versus 19,9% para MMF, p = 0,203). Os pacientes tratados com EC-MPS apresentaram maior incidência de eventos adversos gastrointestinais comparados com os tratados com MMF (57,7% vs. 52,5%). Infecções virais foram mais frequentes no grupo EC-MPS (38,2%) comparado com MMF (32,6%). Não houve diferença nos valores médios tolerados no final do primeiro (1187 ± 344 mg vs. 1209 ± 426 mg, p = 0,294) e segundo ano (1172,3 ± 347mg vs. 1197,4 ± 430,6 mg, p = 0,241) pós-transplante.Conclusão:Não houve diferença estatística na incidência de rejeição aguda, função tardia e eventos gastrointestinais entre os tratamentos. A dose média tolerada de MPA foi semelhante entre os grupos, mas pacientes tratados com MMF foram submetidos a mais reduções de doses e descontinuações do tratamento.
AbstractIntroduction:Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), pro-drug mycophenolic acid (MPA) is an immunosuppressive effective in the prophylaxis of acute rejection, but associated with gastrointestinal adverse events. Mycophenolate sodium (MPS) with enteric coating was developed with intention of reducing such gastrointestinal adverse events associated with MPA.Objective:To evaluate the tolerability of EC-MPS and MMF in renal transplant recipients.Methods:Retrospective, multicenter study, included 1380 patients who underwent a transplant between 07/01/2004 and 31/07/2007 in 18 Brazilian centers.Results1380 patients enrolled, 702 received EC-MPS and 678 received MMF. The average age of patients was 42.3 years, 60% were male and 62.5% of Caucasian ethnicity. The incidence of events evaluated in the composite endpoint of efficacy was not different between groups at the end of 24 months follow-up (22.9% for EC-MPS to MMF versus19.9%, p = 0.203). Patients treated with EC-MPS had a higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events compared to those treated with MMF (57.7%vs. 52.5%), but there was no statistical difference between groups. Viral infections were more frequent in the EC-MPS group (38.2%) compared with MMF (32.6%). There was no difference in mean tolerated dose after the first (1187 ± 344vs. 1209 ± 426 mg, p = 0.294) and second year (1172.3 ± 347 mgvs. 1197.4 ± 430.6 mg, p = 0.241) after transplantation.Conclusion:There was no statistical difference in the incidence of acute rejection, delayed graft function and gastrointestinal events among treatments. The average tolerated dose of MPA was similar between groups; however, patients treated with MMF underwent more dose reductions and discontinuations of treatment.