Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Rev. bras. saúde matern. infant ; 17(1): 159-167, Jan.-Mar. 2017. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-844238

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objectives: to identify the prevalence of neonatal near miss morbidity in the city of Joinville, SC and the associated factors. Methods: a populational based cross-sectional study including all live births in 2012 registered at SINASC. The near miss cases were identified based on the weight <1500g, Apgar scores at 5th minute <7, gestational age <32 weeks, use of mechanical ventilation or presence of congenital malformation. The gross odds ratios (OR) and its respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated and the logistic regression was performed to obtain the adjusted odds ratios and its respective 95% CI. Results: the prevalence of near miss was 33 per thousand live births (95% CI: 29-37). In the final model, a risk classification of live births according to the City Program (Programa Municipal) (ORaj= 19.7; 95% CI: 14.2 to 27.2), cesarean section (ORaj= 2.1; 95% CI:1.5 to 2.8) and public hospital (ORaj= 1.7; 95% CI: 1.2 to 2.3) remained associated to morbidity near miss. Conclusions: near miss morbidity was 7.3 times higher than neonatal mortality. To know its determinants in different national contexts may include some changes in the focus of public health actions by redirecting to preventive interventions.


Resumo Objetivos: identificar a prevalência de morbidade neonatal near miss no município de Joinville, SC e os fatores associados. Métodos: estudo transversal de base populacional com todos os nascidos vivos do ano de 2012 registrados no SINASC. Os casos de near miss foram identificados com base no peso < 1500g, Apgar de 5º minuto < 7, idade gestacional < 32 semanas, uso de ventilação mecânica ou presença de malformação congênita. Calculou-se o odds ratio (OR) bruto e seus respectivos intervalos de confiança de 95% (IC95%) e realizou-se regressão logística para a obtenção dos odds ratios ajustados e seus respectivos IC95%. Resultados: a prevalência de near miss foi de 33 por mil nascidos vivos (IC95%: 29-37). No modelo final, permaneceram associados à morbidade near miss, a classificação de risco do nascido vivo conforme o Programa Municipal (ORaj = 19,7; IC95%: 14,2-27,2), parto cesáreo (ORaj = 2,1; IC95%: 1,5-2,8) e hospital público (ORaj =1,7; IC95%: 1,2-2,3). Conclusões: a morbidade near miss foi 7,3 vezes maior que a mortalidade neonatal. Conhecer seus determinantes em diferentes contextos nacionais pode propiciar mudança no foco das ações de saúde pública, redirecionando-as para intervenções preventivas.


Subject(s)
Infant Mortality , Live Birth , Morbidity , Near Miss, Healthcare , Brazil/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL