Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Biol. Res ; 38(1): 41-47, 2005. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-404826

ABSTRACT

In this paper we develop a method to estimate lung volume using chest x-rays of small mammals. We applied this method to assess the lung volume of several rodents. We showed that a good estimator of the lung volume is: V*L = 0.496 A V RX ¡Ö 1/2AV RX , where V RX is a measurement obtained from the x-ray that represents the volume of a rectangular box containing the lungs and mediastinum organs. The proposed formula may be interpreted as the volume of an ellipsoid formed by both lungs joined at their bases. When that relationship was used to estimate lung volume, values similar to those expected from allometric relationship were found in four rodents. In two others, M. musculus and R. norvegicus, lung volume was similar to reported data, although values were lower than expected.


Subject(s)
Animals , Cricetinae , Mice , Rats , Lung Volume Measurements/veterinary , Models, Biological , Radiography, Thoracic/veterinary , Lung Volume Measurements/methods , Radiography, Thoracic/methods
2.
Biol. Res ; 35(3/4): 411-419, 2002. ilus, tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-339734

ABSTRACT

We studied the departure from the physical optimality of the bronchial tree of rats using both i) the minimum volume and power and ii) the minimum surface and drag criteria, considering the bronchial junction as the unit study based on Zamir's model for vascular trees. Our results show deviations of the junctions of the bronchial tree from the expected optimums in the proximal airway that can be explained by both, the turbulent or transitional flow regime, and the airway's necessity to distribute its terminal branches in the alveolar surface filling the thoracic volume. The departures of the observed values at the optimum for the minimum volume and power were significantly different than the obtained departure values for the minimum surface and drag criteria. The departure from the optimum was directly related to the diameter of the smallest branch. The slopes of the regressions for the two criteria were different. The regression lines intercept at a bronchial diameter d2 = 0.129 mm. This result agreed with the idea that the tube diameter is limited at small values by the increasing flow resistance with decreasing tube diameter while at large values is limited by the increasing tube volume and dead space with increasing tube diameter


Subject(s)
Animals , Male , Female , Bronchi , Models, Biological , Rats , Analysis of Variance , Bronchography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL