Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
IRCMJ-Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. 2011; 13 (3): 178-180
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-129616

ABSTRACT

Reamed interlocking intramedullary nailing is considered the gold standard treatment for complex fractures of the femoral and tibial shaft. There has been some controversies about dynamization of statically locked nails, and some authors recommended routine dynamization for promotion of healing. This study aims to evaluate treatment of complex fractures in tibia and femur with static interlocking intramedullary nail method. In a retrospective study from January 2003 to April 2008, 173 patients with femoral and tibial shaft fracture that were treated with this method were enrolled. No rod was dynamized in our patients. All patients with tibial fractures achieved union without any need for dynamization during 12-18 weeks [mean; 13.4 weeks]. Four patients developed delayed union but all achieved union without any intervention. In femoral fracture, all but one patient achieved complete union during 10-30 weeks [mean: 18.3 weeks]. One patient developed non-union who was treated by an exchange nailing and iliac bone graft method. No significant complication was observed in our patients. It is not necessary to routinely dynamize nails in tibial and femoral shaft fractures as all fractures united in acceptable alignment without any complication


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Male , Tibial Fractures/surgery , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary , Retrospective Studies
2.
IRCMJ-Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. 2008; 10 (4): 294-297
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-94405

ABSTRACT

Whether non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have a detrimental effect on tendon regeneration is still a matter of debate. As such, the purpose of this study is to determine the effect of diclofenac on tendon healing. Sixty four guinea pigs were randomly divided into two main groups [group A: histological study, group B: biomechanical study]. Then tenotomy and repair of right Achilles tendon were done. Half of the animals in each group received diclofenac [1 mg/kg/bid] and the other half received placebo. Half of the animals in each group were sacrificed at 2 weeks and the remaining animals at 6 weeks post-operation. In group A, histological study for determining maturity of healing of tendons in diclofenac and control groups was done, and in group B, tensile force to failure of tendons at two and six weeks of post tenotomy was determined. After two weeks, of the group A1, four animals in the experimental and five in the control group were labeled as relative immature. Four of the animals in the experimental and two in the control subgroups were labeled as relative immature. These differences were not significant. In group A2, five animals in the experimental and three in the control group were in the relative mature and three of those in the experimental and four of the control group were labeled as relative immature group. In group A1, the tensile force to failure was 24.175 N and 25.371 N in the experimental and control groups, respectively. In group B2, mean force to failure was 41.019 N in the experimental and 39.743 N in the control group. There was no significant difference between both groups. Diclofenac at the dosage of 1 mg/kg/bid did not appear to affect histological and biomechanical characteristics of tendon healing


Subject(s)
Animals, Laboratory , Wound Healing/drug effects , Diclofenac , Guinea Pigs , Prospective Studies , Case-Control Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL