Multiple cardiac malformation and congenital nephrotic syndrome in two sibbling from Iran

Congenital nephrotic syndrome is a rare disease in Iran but co morbidity with cardiac malformation in two consecutive male siblings with pulmonic stenosis, closed VSD, severe PS with small ASD and sever Right ventricular hypertrophy and tricuspid regurgitation is reported

Frequency of BCR-ABL fusion transcript in Iranian patients with chronic myeloid leukemia

Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR] assay is a useful tool for the detection of fusion transcript resulting from specific chromosomal translocation of the leukemia cells. A specific chromosomal abnormality, the Philadelphia chromosome [Ph], is present in 90% to 95% of CML patients. The aberration results from a reciprocal translocation between chromosome 9 and 22, creating a BCR-ABL fusion gene. There are two major forms of the BCR/ABL fusion gene, involving ABL exon 2, but including different exons of BCR gene. The transcripts b2a2 or b3a2 code for a p210 protein. Another fusion gene leads to the expression of an e1a2 transcript, which codes for a p190 pro-tein. Another, less common fusion genes are b3a3 or b2a3 [p203] and e19a2 [p230]. The incidence of one or other rearrangement in chronic myeloid leukemia [CML] patients varies in different reported series. In general, fusion transcripts are determined individually, a process which is labor intensive in or-der to detect all major fusion transcripts. This study was designed to determine the frequency of different fusion genes in 75 iranian patients with CML. peripheral blood samples were analyzed by multiplex reverse transcriptase poly-merase chain reaction [RT-PCR] from adult patients to detect all types of BCR-ABL transcripts of the t [9:22] and found that all cases were positive for some type of BCR/ABL rearrangement. Most of our patients showed b3a2 fusion gene [62%], while the remaining showed one of the transcripts of b2a2, b3a3, b2a3, e1a2 or coexpression of b3a2 and b2a2. The rate of coexpression of the b3a2 and b2a2 was 5%. In contrast to the other reports, we did not see any coexpression of p210/p190. This may reflect either the sensitivity of the detection techniques used or the possibility of genetic differences be-tween the populations studied. Coexpression may be due to alternative splicing or to phenotypic varia-tion, with clinical course different from classical CML