Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Annals of King Edward Medical College. 2006; 12 (1): 71-74
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-75792

ABSTRACT

Duodenal injury is the most important hollow viscus injury in the abdomen. The study analysed the outcome of duodenal injuries at the unit. Prospectively collected data on a case series involving 23 patients over 3 years. It involved demographic details, part of duodenum injured, injury severity according to the AAST, injury-operation time lag, mode of repair, and the extent of significant associated injuries. M:F ratio was 4.75:1. Mean age 33yrs. Patients with non-perforating injury were excluded. All were operated by a senior registrar or senior. 7/23 were blunt, 13/23 firearm and 3/23 stab injuries. D2 was involved in 87%. Injury severity was graded according to AAST [American Association for Surgery of Trauma]. 17/23 were Grade II/III, 3 Grade IV and 3 Grade V injuries. Four had injury-operation lag of >18hrs. Two injuries were missed. All injuries up to Grade IV had simple repair. Two of them had T-tube duodenostomy. None had pyloric exclusion. Complex repairs wer e required for 3/23 patients. Five patients died, as a result of associated insults. One delayed repair developed duodenal fistula. Intra-abdominal abscess, septicaemia and wound dehiscence were seen in two patients each. Duodenum-related mortality was zero. Adverse prognostic factors towards morbidity were injury severity >GIII and injury-operation lag >18hrs. The mortality was related to associated injuries. Primary repair is sufficient for most non-resectional duodenal injuries


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Duodenum/surgery , Prospective Studies , Prognosis , Injury Severity Score , Treatment Outcome , Postoperative Complications
2.
PJS-Pakistan Journal of Surgery. 1995; 11 (2): 117-120
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-39262

ABSTRACT

A study of 20 consecutive patients with duodenal injuries admitted in a Surgical Unit of Mayo Hospital, Lahore in the year 1993 - 95 is presented. Majority of patients were young [mean age 28.5 years] male [90%]. Penetrating injuries [80%] were far more common than blunt trauma. According to organ injury scale [OIS], eight patients had Grade I and II injuries, twelve had Grade III and IVinjuries. Eighty five percent of patients had associated injuries to other organs. Primary duodenal repair [60%], duodenal repair with gastro jejunostomy [30%], resection of duodenum with duodenojejunal end to end anastomosis [5%], and pyloric exclusion with gastro jejunostomy [5%] were the procedures carried out. Morbidity in this series was 85% and mortality 20%


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Wounds, Nonpenetrating , Wounds, Penetrating , Injury Severity Score , Abdominal Injuries/diagnosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL