Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine ; : 119-130, 2003.
Article in Japanese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-372017

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to investigate whether isometric resistance exercise (IRE) can attenuate musculoskeletal atrophy during unloading and accelerate its recovery during reloading. Twenty-six female Fischer 344 rats, aged 16 weeks, had their hindlimbs suspended for 3 weeks (unloading) ; 12 of these rats were allowed subsequent cage activity (reloading) for 3 weeks with or without IRE. IRE (stationary support on a cylindrical grid inclined 60 or 80 degrees) was done for 30 min/day, 6 days/week, with an additional load of 30% or 50% body mass attached to the tail during the unloading and reloading periods. The tibial bone and hindlimb skeletal muscles from four experimental and two age-matched control groups were evaluated with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, mechanical testing, and muscle mass measurement. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in the whole tibia and in 7 regions divided equally along the long axis of the epiphysis from proximal (R1) to distal (R7) . After unloading, fat-free dry mass (FFDM), bone mineral content (BMC), and BMD of the whole tibia decreased by 8%, 10%, and 6%, respectively. FFDM and BMC, but not BMD, returned to the levels of age-matched controls during reloading. Unloading-induced decreases in BMD were observed in the regions from the proximal epiphysis to the diaphysis (R1 to R4) and the distal epiphysis (R7) . The rate of decrease in BMD was regionally specific and was particularly pronounced (12%) in the most proximal region (R1) . These findings indicate regional variations in responses of BMD to skeletal unloading. The BMD in R2 to R4 remained less than that in age-matched control after reloading. No significant changes were observed in maximum breaking load, energy, and deformation after unloading and reloading. Hindlimb-unloading induced loss of mass in the soleus (38%), plantaris (14%), gastrocnemius (25%), tibialis anterior (8%), extensor digitorum longus ( 8%), and rectos lemons (17%) muscles, but the mass of muscles, except for the soleus muscle, recovered during reloading. IRE ameliorated the loss of mass in the soleus and gastrocnemius muscles during unloading but did not promote the recovery of mass in any muscles during reloading. Moreover, IRE showed no effect on bone responses after unloading and reloading. This lack of beneficial effects of IRE on osteopenia may be due, in part, to insufficient exerciseinduced load. We concluded that 1) regional analysis of BMD can be used to assess local bone metabolism, 2) the response of BMD to altered loading conditions does not necessarily depend on the response of muscle mass, 3) recovery from osteopenia progresses more slowly than that from sarcopenia, and a longer time than the unloading period is required to restore BMD. Further studies are needed to develop more effective countermeasures against osteopenia and sarcopenia.

2.
Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine ; : 311-317, 1996.
Article in Japanese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-371732

ABSTRACT

Structural and mechanical adaptations of the femur and tibia to jump and run training were investigated in female Fischer 344 rats. Rats aged 4 weeks were trained for 8 weeks after 1 week of stabilization. In experiment A, the forced run-trained (speed : 30 m/min, duration: 1 h/day) group was compared with the control group. In experiment B, voluntary run and jump-trained (height : 40 cm, 100 times/day) groups were compared with the control group. The limb bones of the jump-trained group had greater cross-sectional areas and greater maximum load in a fracture test than the limb bones of the control group, but there was no significant difference in bone length between the jump-trained group and the controls. The bone adaptations to forced running and voluntary running were similar. The limb bones of both run groups were longer than those of each control group. The cross-sectional areas and the maximum load in the run-trained groups were greater than those in each control group but less than those in the jump-trained group. The present results indicate that bone adaptations to jump training and run training differ and that jump training is more effective for building stronger bones.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL