Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Indian J Cancer ; 2023 Jun; 60(2): 185-190
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-221774

ABSTRACT

Background: Adequate lymphadenectomy in middle? and lower?third esophagus cancer is still a matter of debate. This study aims to find out the extent of histopathological supracarinal lymph nodes positivity rate to establish an adequate lymph node dissection in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cases operated up?front or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) + radiotherapy (RT) and its short?term oncological outcome. Materials and Methods: After approval from institutional board review, a retrospective study was conducted from April 2017 to September 2019. A total of 76 patients having mid? or lower?third carcinoma esophagus were operated at our institute for partial/total esophagectomy with extended two?field lymph node dissection were followed. Intraoperative nodal stations were harvested separately and lebeled individually according to the Japanese Esophageal Classification and sent for histopathological examination. Results: The patients had an average age of 52 years. Histologically all were squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Forty?four patients received preoperative concurrent RT plus drug therapy, whereas 18 cases were operated up?front. Fourteen patients were operated after palliative treatment (CT/RT). The average total lymph node yield was 22 nodes (range 3�). In 26 patients (34.2%), lymph nodes were positive (N+ disease). Supracarinal nodes were positive in 20 cases (26.31%). The average supracarinal lymph node yield was 10.33 nodes (range 2�). Five patients (6.5%) had only supracarinal lymph nodes positive on histopathological examination. Seventeen patients had a complete pathological response rate (pCR). Conclusion: In cases of mid?third esophageal carcinoma, extended two fields with supracarinal lymphadenectomy is strongly recommended even after the patient has received neoadjuvant treatment, although the same for lower?third/gastroesophageal (GE) junction tumors should be considered.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL