Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
The Journal of Korean Knee Society ; : 95-100, 2015.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-759172

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine what proportion of patients visiting a tertiary knee clinic had pre-obtained knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to assess the impact of pre-obtained knee MRI on the selection of treatment plans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six hundred and eighty patients were enrolled from patients who visited our knee clinic during a 6-month period. The proportion of patients with pre-obtained knee MRI was calculated, and associations of sociodemographic factors, disease category, and finally selected treatment options with knee MRI pre-obtainment were investigated. A utility assessment panel of five orthopaedic surgeons was formed and established utility assessment criteria. Two rounds of utility assessment (before and after MRI review) were performed. RESULTS: Of the 680 patients, 185 (27%) had pre-obtained knee MRI. In the first round of utility assessment, 39%, 18%, and 43% of the 185 knee MRIs were evaluated as useful, equivocal, and arguably useless, respectively, and almost identical results were obtained in the second round. The proportion of assessed 'useful MRI' was higher in sports related injury (84%) and other conditions (91%) than in degenerative joint disease (18%) and nonspecific knee pain (31%). Utility assessment results among panels varied little for practice patterns and education duration. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests clinicians should reconsider and counsel patients the expected utility of knee MRI acquisition.


Subject(s)
Humans , Education , Joint Diseases , Knee , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Sports
2.
Yonsei Medical Journal ; : 493-498, 2014.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-47153

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Although the analgesic effects of corticosteroids have been well documented, little information is available on periarticular injection (PI) containing corticosteroids for early postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We performed a prospective double-blind randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an intraoperative corticosteroid PI in patients undergoing TKA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-six consecutive female patients undergoing bilateral staged TKA were randomized to receive steroid or non-steroid PI, with 3 months separating the procedures. The steroid group received PI with a mixture containing triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg). The non-steroid group received the same injection mixture without corticosteroid. During the postoperative period, nighttime pain, functional recovery [straight leg raising (SLR) ability and maximal flexion], patient satisfaction, and complications were recorded. Short-term postoperative clinical scores and patient satisfaction were evaluated at 6 months. RESULTS: The pain level was significantly lower in the PI steroid than the non-steroid group on the night of the operation (VAS, 1.2 vs. 2.3; p=0.021). Rebound pain was observed in both groups at POD1 (VAS, 3.2 vs. 3.8; p=0.248), but pain remained at a low level thereafter. No significant differences were seen in maximal flexion, frequency of acute rescuer, clinical scores, and patient satisfaction. The steroid group was able to perform SLR earlier than the non-steroid group (p=0.013). The incidence of complications was similar between the groups. CONCLUSION: PI containing a corticosteroid provided an additional pain-relieving effect on the night of the operation. In addition, corticosteroid PI did not increase the perioperative complications of TKA.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Adrenal Cortex Hormones , Arthroplasty , Incidence , Knee , Leg , Methods , Pain Management , Pain, Postoperative , Patient Satisfaction , Postoperative Period , Prospective Studies , Triamcinolone Acetonide
3.
The Journal of the Korean Rheumatism Association ; : 185-195, 2007.
Article in Korean | WPRIM | ID: wpr-196286

ABSTRACT

The knee is a complex structure and far from being the simple hinge joint of popular belief. Knee pain would not be properly understood unless one is familiar with the anatomy and understands the role of the various structures. For patient consultation or for selecting a treatment option, it is crucial to find the central cause of symptoms and functional disabilities of the patient based on a detailed history, a focused examination and, when indicated, the selective use of appropriate imaging and laboratory studies. The history taking should be comprehensive and include the demographic characteristics, past medical history, comprehending the associated trauma, pain characteristics and quality of life. Basic physical examination should include inspection of walking pattern and the knee, evaluation of joint effusion, range of motion and the location of tenderness, and precise assessment of joint stability. Although many advanced diagnostic tools are available, plain radiographs are frequently utilized as a primary tool to evaluate conditions of the knee joint for practical and economic reasons. A weight-bearing anteroposterior radiographs should be taken for appropriate evaluation of the condition of the tibiofemoral joint, and weight-bearing radiographs in semi-flexed position is valuable to evaluate the joint space more precisely. To evaluate the patellofemoral joint, axial and lateral views should be included in the routine radiographs. In practice, physicians need to be cautious not to easily reach the conclusion that the symptoms of the knee joint can be attributed to only a few clinical findings in consulting the patients with knee pain.


Subject(s)
Humans , Diagnosis, Differential , Joints , Knee Joint , Knee , Patellofemoral Joint , Physical Examination , Quality of Life , Range of Motion, Articular , Walking , Weight-Bearing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL