Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Journal of Family and Reproductive Health. 2010; 4 (4): 175-178
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-113416

ABSTRACT

To evaluate, the efficacy of sub hypnotic doses of midazolam and propofol, in prophylactic control of postoperative nausea and vomiting, in parturients undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, 114 ASA physical status I-II parturient undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia [using 0.5% bupivacaine 12 mg] were allocated randomly to receive propofol [20 mg bolus and 1.0 mg/kg/hr infusion, n=38] or midazolam [1 mg bolus and 2.0 mg/hr infusion, n=38] or saline [2 cc IV, n=38] immediately after clamping of umbilical cord. The occurrence of nausea and/or vomiting and respiratory depression was recorded during operation until 12 hr after that. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in midazolam and propofol groups compared with saline group in all 12 hr, [nausea: 19%, 15.8% versus 57.9%], vomiting [7.9%, 5% versus 34.2%]. There was not manifestation of respiratory depression at the time of surgery and after it. Sub hypnotic dose of midazolam was as effective as the sub hypnotic dose of propofol for preventing of nausea and vomiting in parturients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. We undertook this study in regard to examine a simple, safe and non-expensive antiemetic method

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL