Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Chinese Medical Journal ; (24): 943-947, 2019.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-772172

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND@#To prevent risk of life-threatening stent thrombosis, all patients need to undergo dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for at least 6 weeks to 12 months after stent implantation. If DAPT is continued during noncardiac surgery, there is a risk of severe bleeding at the surgical site. Our study was to assess the risk of bleeding in patients with continued DAPT during orthopedic surgery.@*METHODS@#The clinical data of 78 patients with coronary heart disease who underwent orthopedic surgery from February 2006 to July 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Prior to orthopedic surgery, DAPT was continued in 16 patients (group I), 24 patients were treated with single antiplatelet therapy (group II), and 26 patients received low-molecular-weight heparin therapy for more than 5 days after the discontinuation of all antiplatelet therapies (group III). Twelve patients were excluded, as they had undergone minimally invasive surgery such as transforaminal endoscopy and vertebroplasty. The perioperative blood loss of each patient was calculated using Nadler's formula and Gross' formula. The intraoperative bleeding volume, total volume of intraoperative bleeding in addition to postoperative drainage, and total blood loss were compared between groups. The level of significance was set at P  0.05). Six patients experienced postoperative cardiovascular complications due to the delayed restart of antiplatelet therapy; one of these patients in group III died from myocardial infarction.@*CONCLUSIONS@#Continued DAPT or single antiplatelet treatment during orthopedic surgery does not increase the total intraoperative and perioperative bleeding compared with switching from antiplatelet therapy to low-molecular-weight heparin. However, the discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy increases the risk of serious cardiac complications.


Subject(s)
Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Hemorrhage , Epidemiology , Orthopedic Procedures , Orthopedics , Methods , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors , Therapeutic Uses , Postoperative Complications , Retrospective Studies
2.
Chinese Medical Journal ; (24): 1420-1424, 2012.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-324962

ABSTRACT

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Patients with pelvic fractures are often treated in hospitals without the capacity to implement an open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). This often leads to pelvic malunion in patients with unstable pelvic fracture, shock or even death due to uncontrollable pelvic hemorrhage and unstable hemodynamics. This study explored the role of early external fixation (within 7 days) for patients with unstable pelvic fractures.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 32 patients with unstable pelvic fractures treated with early external fixation from January 2005 to January 2010 (Tile type B: 18 cases; C: 14 cases). The study comprised 28 males and 4 females, with a mean age of (32 ± 8) years (range, 21-56 years). Of these patients, 22 were treated with emergency pelvic external fixation and 10 were treated with external fixation within 1-7 days. Fifteen cases suffered traumatic hemorrhagic shock. A statistical analysis was conducted to compare fluid infusion and blood transfusion volumes within the first 24 hours of these shock patients with another cohort of patients treated without early external fixation from January 1993 to January 1998.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The average follow-up was (34.7 ± 14.6) months (range, 6-66 months). Six to eight weeks after external fixation, patients could walk with crutches; by 12 weeks, external fixation was removed and all fractures had healed. Seven patients presented with sequelae, including 3 patients with long-term lumbosacral pain, 3 patients with erectile dysfunction and 1 patient with Morel-Lavallee lesion and other complications. The 15 shock patients in this study (2005-2010 group) required significantly lower volumes of fluid infusion and blood transfusion (P(fluid) = 0.000; P(transfusion) = 0.000) as compared to the 1993-1998 cohort.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>The early application of external fixation in unstable pelvic fracture patients positively affects hemodynamic stability, with outstanding efficacy as a final fixation option for unstable pelvic fractures.</p>


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , External Fixators , Fracture Fixation , Methods , Fractures, Bone , General Surgery , Hemodynamics , Pelvic Bones , Wounds and Injuries , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL