Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
SJA-Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia. 2014; 8 (3): 368-373
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-152553

ABSTRACT

Post-operative pain frequently hampers implementation of day care arthroscopic knee surgery in spite of so many analgesic, local anesthetic drugs and routes of administration. The aim of the present study was carried out to compare the efficacy of ropivacaine and levobupivacaine when administered through intra-articular route in controlling pain after day care arthroscopic knee surgery. It was a prospective, double-blinded and randomized controlled study. April 2008-December 2008, 60 patients of both sex, of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II, undergoing day care arthroscopic knee surgery were randomly assigned into two groups [R, L]. Group R received 10 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine, whereas group L received 10 ml of 0.50% levobupivacaine through intra-articular route at the end of the procedure. Pain assessed using visual analog scale [VAS] and diclofenac sodium given as rescue analgesia when VAS >3. Time of first analgesic request and total rescue analgesic were calculated. Based on comparable demographic profiles; time for the requirement of first post-operative rescue analgesia [242.16 +/- 23.86 vs. 366.62 +/- 24.42] min and total mean rescue analgesic requirement was [104.35 +/- 18.96 vs. 76.82 +/- 14.28] mg in group R and L respectively. Group R had higher mean VAS score throughout the study period. No side effects found among the groups. These two results were clinically and statistically significant [P < 0.05]. Hence, it was evident that intra-articular levobupivacaine give better post-operative pain relief, with an increase in time of first analgesic request and decreased need of total post-operative analgesia compared with ropivacaine

2.
SJA-Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia. 2014; 8 (1): 25-29
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-138054

ABSTRACT

Postoperative nausea and vomiting [PONV] frequently hampers implementation of ambulatory surgery in spite of so many antiemetic drugs and regimens. the study was carried out to compare the efficacy of Ramosetron and Ondansetron in preventing PONV after ambulatory surgery. It was a prospective, double blinded, and randomized controlled study. 124 adult patients of either sex, aged 25-55, of ASA physical status I and II, scheduled for day care surgery, were randomly allocated into Group A [[n=62] receiving [IV] Ondansetron [4 mg]] and Group B [[n=62] receiving IV Ramosetron [0.3 mg]] prior to the induction of general anesthesia in a double-blind manner. Episodes of PONV were noted at 0.5, 1, 2, 4 h, 6, 12, and 18 h postoperatively. Statistically significant difference between Groups A and B [P <0.05] was found showing that Ramosetron was superior to Ondansetron as antiemetic both regarding frequency and severity. it was evident that preoperative prophylactic administration of single dose IV Ramosetron [0.3 mg] has better efficacy than single dose IV Ondansetron [4 mg] in reducing the episodes of PONV over 18 h postoperatively in patients undergoing day-care surgery under general anesthesia


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Male , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/drug therapy , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures , Ondansetron , Benzimidazoles , Benzimidazoles/administration & dosage , Ondansetron/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Prospective Studies , Anesthesia, General
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL